Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Главная страница
Доступ к статьям
Электронная подача статей, правила для авторов и тп
Вход для рецензентов
Здесь можно подписаться на новостную рассылку RJT
Контактная информация

English version

Intra-species structuring in the common shrew Sorex araneus (Lipotyphla: Soricidae) in European Russia: morphometric variability could give evidence of limitation of interpopulation migration
Shchipanov N.A., Voyta L.L., Bobretsov A.V., Kuprianova I.F.
P. 119-140
The shape of the skull, mandible, and first lower molar (m1) in 10 geographical samples from four chromosomal races of two karyotypic groups were studied using geometric morphometrics. Discriminant analysis with cross-validation was used to test the accuracy of classifications of specimens using skull shape. The percentage of correct classifications attributed to race varied from 61.8% to 89.5% and ranged from 51.6% to 82.3% for geographical samples. The structuring between races, as measured with Qst (this metric is analogous to Fst, and the latter is used as a measure of genetic disparity between samples), was less than population-level structuring both within and between races. Variance between karyotypic groups in skull size, mandible, and molar shape was greater than between races. In skull shape, the variance was smaller as compared to the inter-racial level without larger “mountain” samples and greater when the entire set of samples was estimated. Interpopulation differences in all census characteristics were the most prominent. The magnitude of Qst in interpopulation estimations was similar both among populations of the same race and among populations of different races. Lack of correlation of Qst level with geographical distance between samples was found both in size and shape of the skull, mandible, and first lower molar. The significant difference between populations within a race was regarded as evidence of limitation of interpopulation migration. Each pair of geographic samples has a unique set of differentiating features. The stochastic variability of traits between the local samples, irrespective of race, is interpreted as evidence of genetic drift within partly isolated local populations. Diminishing differences between races could be a consequence of reabsorbing those stochastic morphological differences back into the metapopulations. The greater level of phenotypic differentiation between karyotypic groups compared to races is interpreted as a greater amount of time elapsed since the time of common ancestry.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.13.2.08


  • Andersson A.-C. 2004. Postglacial population history of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in Fennoscandia: Molecular studies of recolonisation, sex-biased gene flow and the formation of chromosome races // Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations of the Faculty of Science and Technology. Vol.986. P.1-56.
  • Banaszek A., Smakulska J., Fedyk S., Jadwiszczak K.A. & Chętnicki W. 2003. Morphometric differentiation of shrews Sorex araneus L., 1758 from the hybrid zone between Guzovy Młyn and Lęgucki Młyn chromosomal races in Poland // Mammalia. Vol.67. P.217-224.
  • Barton N.H. & Hewitt G.M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Vol.16. P.113-148.
  • Beklemishev V.N. 1960. [Spatial and functional structure of population] // [Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series]. Vol.65. P.41-45 [in Russian].
  • Bookstein F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 435 p.
  • Bobretsov A.V. 2004. [The common shrew] // Kuprianov A.G. (ed.). Mlekopitaushchie Pechoro-Ilychskogo Zapovednika. Syktyvkar: Komi knizhnoe izdatelstvo. P.46-64 [in Russian].
  • Bobretsov A.V., Kuprianova I.F., Kalinin A.A., Petrov A.N., Pavlova S.V. & Shchipanov N.A. 2012. [Morphological differentiation of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in the north-eastern European Russia] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.91. P.605-618 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • Bolshakov V.N., Vasiliev A.G. & Sharova L.P. 1996. [Fauna and Population Ecology of Shrews in Ural (Mammalia, Soricidae)]. Yekaterinburg: Izdatelstvo Ekaterinburg. 268 p. [in Russian]
  • Brünner H., Lugon-Moulin N., Balloux F., Fumagalli L. & Hausser J. 2002. A taxonomical re-evaluation of the Valais chromosome race of the common shrew Sorex araneus (Insectivora: Soricidae) // Acta Theriologica. Vol.47. P.245-275.
  • Bulatova N., Jones R.M., White T.A., Shchipanov N.A., Pavlova S.V. & Searle J.B. 2011. Natural hybridization between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in European Russia // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Vol.24. P.573-586.
  • Bystrakova N.V., Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N.Sh., Sheftel B.I., Nadjafova R.S., Pavlova S.V., Demidova T.B., Bobretsov A.V., Aleksandrov D.Yu., Kalinin A.A., Kouptsov A.V., Volkova A.T., Oleinichenko V.Yu. & Searle J.B. 2007. New data on the geographic distribution of chromosome races of Sorex araneus (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) in European Russia // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.105-109.
  • Cardini A. & Elton S. 2008. Does the skull carry a philogenetic signal? Evolution and modularity in the guenons // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.93. P.813-834.
  • Cardini A. & Tongiorgi P. 2003. Yellow-bellied marmots 'in the shape space': sexual dimorphism, growth and allometry of the mandible // Zoomorphology. Vol.122. P.11-23.
  • Caumul R. & Polly P.D. 2005. Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia) // Evolution. Vol.59. P.2460-2472.
  • Chitty D. 1967. The natural selection of self-regulatory behaviour in animal populations // Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia. Vol.2. P.51-78.
  • Chętnicki W., Fedyk S., Banaszek A., Szalaj K.A. & Ratkiewicz M. 1996. Morphometrical characteristics of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) from interracial hybrid zones // Hereditas. Vol.125. P.201-207.
  • Churchfield S. 1990. The Natural History of Shrews. London: Christopher Helm Press. 178 p.
  • Dehnel A. 1949. Studies on the genus Sorex L. // Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Vol.4. P.17-102.
  • Degteva S. 2006. Plant communities // Taskaev A.I. (ed.). Virgin Forests of Komi. Moscow: Publishing Center of Design, Information, Cartography. P.88-115.
  • Dolgov V.A. 1985. [Red-toothed Shrews of the Old World]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo MGU. 221 p. [in Russian]
  • Franklin D., Cardini A. & Oxnard Ch. 2010. A geometric morphometric approach to the quantification of population variation in Sub-Saharan African crania // American Journal of Human Biology. Vol.22. P.23-35.
  • Fredga K. 2007. Reconstruction of the postglacial colonization of Sorex araneus into northern Scandinavia based on karyotype studies, and the subdivision of the Abisko race into three // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.85-96.
  • Fredga K. & Narain Y. 2000. The complex hybrid zone between the Abisko and Sidensjö chromosome races of Sorex araneus in Sweden // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.70. P.285-307.
  • Frykman I. & Bengtsson B.O. 1984. Genetic differentiation in Sorex. III. Electrophoretic analyses of a hybrid zone between two karyotypic races in Sorex araneus // Heriditas. Vol.100. P.259-270.
  • Frykman I., Simonsen V. & Bengtsson B.O. 1983. Genetic differentiation in Sorex. I. Electrophoretic analyses of the karyotypic races of Sorex araneus in Sweden // Heriditas. Vol.99. P.279-292.
  • Gureev A.A. 1979. [Insectivores. Hedgehogs, Moles and Shrews (Erinaceidae, Talpidae, Soricidae). Fauna USSR, Mammals]. Vol.4. No.2. Leningrad: Nauka. 503 p. [in Russian]
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis // Palaeontologia Electronica. Vol.4. P.1-9.
  • Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 328 p.
  • Hausser J. 1994. The Sorex of the araneus-arcticus group (Mammalia, Soricidae): do they actually speciate // Merrit J.F., Kirkland G.L. & Rose R.K. (eds.). Advances in the Biology of Shrews. Pittsburgh: Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Vol.18. P.295-306.
  • Hausser J., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Searle J.B., Volobuev V., Wójcik J. & Zima J. 1994. Definition and nomenclature of chromosome races of Sorex araneus // Folia Zoologica. Vol.43. P.1-9.
  • Hausser J., Hutterer R. & Vogel P. 1990. Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758 - Waldspitzmaus // Niethammer J. & Krapp F. (eds.). Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Insektenfresser, Herrentiere. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag. Bd.3. S.237-278.
  • Homolka M. 1980. Biometrisher Vergleich zweier Populationen Sorex araneus // Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemicae Brno. Bd.14. S.1-34.
  • Horn A., Basset P., Yannic G., Banaszek A., Borodin P.M., Bulatova N.Sh., Jadwiszczak K., Jones R.M., Polyakov A.V., Ratkiewicz M., Searle J.B., Shchipanov N.A., Zima J. & Hausser J. 2012. Chromosomal rearrangements do not seem to affect the gene flow in hybrid zones between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) // Evolution. Vol.66. P.882-889.
  • Hutterer R. 2005. Order Soricomorpha // Wilson D.E. & Reeder D.M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Vol.2. P.220-311.
  • Jiggins C.D. & Mallet J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol.15. P.250-255.
  • Key K.H.L. 1968. The concept of stasipatric speciation // Systematic Zoology. Vol.17. P.14-22.
  • Klingenberg C.P. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics // Molecular Ecology Resources. Vol.11. P.353-357.
  • Kuprianova I.F. 1976. [Abundance and biotopic relations in red-toothed shrews in Arkhangelsk area] // Miheev A.V. (ed.). Fauna i Ekologia Zhivotnykh. Moskva: MGPI. Part 2. P.170-185 [in Russian].
  • Kuprianova I.F. 1994. [The common shrew] // Bolshakov V.N. (ed.). Fauna Evropeiskogo Severo-Vostoka Rossii. Mlekopitayushchie. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka. Vol.2. Part 1. P.11-25 [in Russian].
  • Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control // Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America. Vol.15. P.237-240.
  • Lugon-Mouline N., Balloux F. & Hausser J. 2000. Genetic differentiation of common shrew Sorex araneus populations among different alpine valleys revealed by microsatellites // Acta Theriologica. Vol.45. P.103-117.
  • Lugon-Mouline N., Brünner H., Wyttenbach A., Hausser J. & Goudet J. 1999. Hierarchical analyses of genetic differentiation in a hybrid zone of Sorex araneus (Insectivora: Soricidae) // Molecular Ecology. Vol.8. P.419-431.
  • Meyer A. & Searle J.B. 1994. Morphological studies on British common shrews // Folia Zoologica. Vol.43. P.115.
  • Mishta A.V. 2007. Morphometric variation of the common shrew Sorex araneus in Ukraine, in relation to geoclimatic factors and karyotype // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.51-62.
  • Moska M. & Paśko Ł. 2006. Morphometric variation between karyological categories of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in the Legucki Młyn/Popielno hybrid zone // Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Veterinary Medicine. Vol.9. No.1.
  • Naumov N.P. 1963. [Animal Ecology]. Moskva: Vysshaya Shkola. 618 p. [in Russian]
  • Ochocińska D. & Taylor J.R.E. 2003. Bergmann's rule in shrews: geographic variation of body size in Palearctic Sorex species // Biological Journal of Linnaean Society. Vol.78. P.356-381.
  • O'Higgins P. & Collard M. 2002. Sexual dimorphism and facial growth in papionin monkeys // Journal of Zoology. Vol.257. P.255-272.
  • Okulova N.M., Balakirev A.E. & Orlov V.N. 2007. Craniometrical characteristics of some Sorex araneus chromosomal races // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.63-71.
  • Orlov V.N., Bulatova N.Sh., Kozlovsky A.I. & Balakirev A.E. 2004. [Hierarchy of intraspecific taxa of the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Insectivora), and taxonomic structure of species in mammals] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.83. P.199-212 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • Orlov V.N., Kozlovsky A.I., Okulova N.M. & Balakirev A.E. 2007. Postglacial recolonisation of the European Russia by the common shrew Sorex araneus // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No1. P.97-104.
  • Pavlova S.V., Bystrakova N.V., Bulatova N., Nadjafova R.S. & Polyakov A.V. 2006. [The cadastre of chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (in Russia)] // Biogeographia. Vol.13. P.42-59 [in Russian with English summary].
  • Polly P.D. 2001. On morphological clocks and paleophylogeography: towards a timescale for Sorex hybrid zones // Genetica. Vol.112-113. P.339-357.
  • Polly P.D. 2003. Paleophylogeography of Sorex araneus: molar shape as a morphological marker for fossil shrews // Mammalia. Vol.67. P.233-242.
  • Polly P.D. 2007. Phylogeographic differentiation in Sorex araneus: morphology in relation to geography and karyotype // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.73-84.
  • Polly P.D., Polyakov A.V., Ilyashenko V.B., Onischenko S.S., White T.A., Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N.Sh., Pavlova S.V., Borodin P.M. & Searle J.B. 2013. Phenotypic variation across chromosomal hybrid zones of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) indicates reduced gene flow // PLoS ONE. 8 (7): e67455. P.1-12.
  • Polyakov A.V., Panov V.V., Ladygina T.Yu., Bochkarev M.N., Rodionova M.I. & Borodin P.M. 2001. Chromosome evolution of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. in postglacial time in the South Ural and Siberia // Russian Journal of Genetic. Vol.37. P.448-455.
  • Polyakov A.V., Onischenko S.S., Ilyashenko V.B., Searle J.B. & Borodin P.M. 2002. Morphometric difference between the Novosibirsk and Thomsk chromosome races of Sorex araneus in a zone of parapatry // Acta Theriologica. Vol.47. P.381-387.
  • Polyakov A.V., White T.A., Jones R.M., Borodin P.M. & Searle J.B. 2011. Natural hybridisation between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in Siberia // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Vol.24. P.1393-1402.
  • Polyakov A.V., Zima J., Searle J.B., Borodin P.M. & Ladygina T.Yu. 2000. Chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in the Ural Mts: a link between Siberia and Scandinavia? // Acta Theriologica. Vol.45. P.19-26.
  • Poroshin E.A., Polly P.D. & Wójcik J.M. 2010. Climate and morphological change on decadal scales: multiannual variation in the common shrew Sorex araneus in northeast Russia // Acta Theriologica. Vol.55. P.193-202.
  • Pucek M. 1965. Water contents and seasonal changes of the brain-weight in shrews // Acta Theriologica. Vol.10. P.353-367.
  • Pucek Z. 1963. Seasonal changes in the braincase of some representatives of the genus Sorex from the Palearctic // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.44. P.523-536.
  • Pucek Z. 1970. Seasonal and age change in shrews as an adaptive process // Symposia of the Zoological Society of London. Vol.26. P.189-207.
  • Raspopova A.A. & Shchipanov N.A. 2011. [Variability of a cytochrome b region in different chromosome races and populations of the common shrew Sorex araneus L., 1758] // Genetika. Vol.47. No.4. P.527-536 [in Russian with English summary].
  • Ratkiewicz M., Fedyk S., Banaszek A., Chętnicki K.A.W., Sazałaj K.A., Gelly L. & Taberlet P. 2002. The evolutionary history of the two karyotypic groups of the common shrew Sorex araneus, in Poland // Heredity. Vol.88. P.235-242.
  • Ratkiewicz M., Banaszek A., Jadwiszczak K.A., Chętnicki W. & Fedyk S. 2003. Genetic diversity, stability of population structure and barriers to gene flow in a hybrid zone between two Sorex araneus chromosome races // Mammalia. Vol.67. P.275-284.
  • Rohlf F.G. & Slice D.E. 1990. Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks // Systematic Zoology. Vol.39. P.40-59.
  • Searle J.B. 1985. Isozyme variation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in Britain in relation to karyotype // Heredity. Vol.55. P.175-180.
  • Searle J.B. 1993. Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals // Harrison R.G. (ed.). Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P.309-353.
  • Searle J.B., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Hausser J. & Volobuev V.T. 1991. Nomenclature for the chromosomes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) // Memoires de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles. Vol.19. P.13-22.
  • Searle J.B., Hausser J., Zima J., Fredga K., Wójcik J.M., Volobuev V.T., Bulatova N.S. & Nadjafova R. 2008. The ISACC heritage // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6 (for 2007). No.2. P.123-167.
  • Searle J.B. & Thorpe R.S. 1987. Morphometric variation of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in Britain, in relation to karyotype and geography // Journal of Zoology. Vol.212. P.373-377.
  • Searle J.B. & Wójcik J.M. 1998. Chromosomal evolution: the case of Sorex araneus // Wójcik J.M. & Wolsan M. (eds.). Evolution of Shrews. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences. P.219-268.
  • Shchipanov N.A. 2002. [Functional organization of population as an approach to studies of population resistance. Applied aspect (small mammals as example)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.81. P.1048-1077 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • Shchipanov N.A. 2003. [Population as a cell of species] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.82. P.450-469 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • Shchipanov N.A. 2007. Understanding the boundaries between chromosome races of common shrews in terms of restricted movement by individual shrews // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.6. No.1. P.117-122.
  • Shchipanov N.A., Bobretsov A.V., Kuprianova I.F. & Pavlova S.V. 2011. Interracial and population variability of phenotypic (cranial) characters in the common shrew Sorex araneus L., 1758 // Russian Journal of Genetics. Vol.47. P.76-86.
  • Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N.Sh., Pavlova S.V. & Shchipanov A.N. 2009. [The common shrew (Sorex araneus) as a model species in ecological and evolutionary studies] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.88. P.975-989 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • Shchipanov N.A., Kalinin A.A., Demidova T.B., Oleinichenko V.Yu., Aleksandrov D.Yu. & Kouptzov A.V. 2005. Population ecology of red-toothed shrews, Sorex araneus, S. caecutiens, S. minutus, and S. isodon, in Central Russia // Merrit J.F., Curchfield S., Hutterer R. & Sheftel B. (eds.). Advances in the Biology of Shrews II. Special Publication of the International Society of Shrew Biologists. New York: International Society of Shrew Biologists. P.201-216.
  • Shchipanov N.A. & Pavlova S.V. 2013. Contact zones and ranges of chromosomal races of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in northeastern European Russia // Folia Zoologica. Vol.62. P.24-35.
  • Slatkin M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies // Genetics. Vol.139. P.457-462.
  • Spitze K. 1993. Population structure in Daphnia obusta: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation // Genetics. Vol.135. P.367-374.
  • Sulkava S., Vahtola M. & Fredga K. 1985. Structure of the upper tooth-row of Sorex araneus in Scandinavia // Acta Zoologica Fennica. Vol.173. P.237-239.
  • Voyta L.L., Omelko V.E. & Petrova E.A. 2013. [Analysis of the morphometrics variability and intraspecific structure of Sorex minutissimus Zimmermann, 1780 (Lipotyphla: Soricidae) in Russia] // Proceedings of Zoological Institute RAS. Vol.317. P.332-351 [in Russian, with English summary].
  • White T.A., Bordewich M. & Searle J.B. 2010. A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems // Systematic Biology. Vol.59. P.262-276.
  • Wójcik J.M. 1991. Chromosomal polymorphism in the common shrew Sorex araneus and its adaptive significance // Mémories de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturales. Vol.19. P.51-62.
  • Wójcik J.M. & Wójcik A.M. 1994. Protein variation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) in Poland in relation to karyotype // Folia Zoologica. Vol.43. P.53-61.
  • Wójcik J.M., Bogdanowicz W., Pucek Z., Wójcik A.M. & Zalewska H. 2000. Morphometric variation of the common shrew Sorex araneus in Poland in relation to karyotype // Acta Theriologica. Vol.45. P.161-172.
  • Wójcik J.M., Borodin P.M., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Hausser J., Mishta A., Orlov V.N., Searle J.B., Volobuev V.T. & Zima J. 2003a. The list of the chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus (updated 2002) // Mammalia. Vol.67. P.169-178.
  • Wójcik J.M., Ratkievicz M. & Searle J.B. 2002. Evolution of the common shrew Sorex araneus: chromosomal and molecular aspects // Acta Theriologica. Vol.47. P.139-167.
  • Wójcik J.M., Wójcik A.M. & Sikorski M.D. 2003b. Morphometric variation of the common shrew Sorex araneus, indifferent habitats // Mammalia. Vol.68. P.225-231.
  • Wójcik J.M., Wójcik A.M. & Zalewska H. 1996. Chromosomal and allozyme variation of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in different habitats // Hereditas. Vol.125. P.183-189.
  • Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations // Annals of Eugenics. Vol.15. P.323-354.
  • Wyttenbach A., Goudet J., Cornuet J.-M. & Hausser J. 1999. Microsatellite variation reveals low genetic subdivision in a chromosome race of Sorex araneus (Mammalia, Insectivora) // Heredity. Vol.90. P.323-327.
  • Yudin B.S. 1989. [Insectivorous Mammals of Siberia]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 360 p. [in Russian]
  • Zelditch M.L., Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D. & Fink W.L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. London: Elsevier Academic Press. 437 p.

Скачать PDF