Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Главная страница
Доступ к статьям
Электронная подача статей, правила для авторов и тп
Вход для рецензентов
Здесь можно подписаться на новостную рассылку RJT
Контактная информация

English version

Short muscles of the hand and foot in Laonastes aenigmamus (Rodentia: Diatomyidae) and some other rock-dwellers
Gambaryan P.P., Zherebtsova O.V.
P. 83-95
The short muscles of the hand and foot in the relict rock rat Laonastes aenigmamus Jenkins et al., 2005 (Rodentia: Diatomyidae) were studied for the first time. Some other rock-dwellers, Ctenodactylus gundi, Chinchilla lanigera, Ochotona macrotis, as well as Ochotona dauurica, inhabiting the plain landscapes, were also included in the morphological analysis for comparative purposes. In spite of the different localities of pikas, the structure of the short muscles of the hand and foot in both species of Ochotona is practically identical. At the same time the pikas differ substantially from the investigated rodents by a number of features of the short muscles: by the absence of the mm. palmaris brevis and add. digiti secundi in the hand and m. abd. metatarsi V in the foot; by the absence of the typical mm. lumbricales in the hand and the whole absence of these muscles in the foot; by the presence only one belly of the m. abd. digiti quinti in the hand instead of two bellies in rodents. In all studied forms, the structure of the m. add. digiti quinti in the hand and the mm. interossei both in the hand and foot, are characterized by a great similarity. Among the three investigated rodents, the most essential differences of the short muscles are connected with the reduction of the first fingers in the hand and foot in Ctenodactylus and Chinchilla. It was indicated that in Laonastes the state of the mm. lumbricales is evidently the most primitive.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.13.2.04


  • Dawson M.R., Marivaux L., Li Ch., Beard K.Ch. & Metais G. 2006. Laonastes and the Lazarus еffect in recent mammals // Science. Vol.311. P.1456-1458.
  • Dieterlen F. 2005. Suborder Hystricomorpha. Infraorder Ctenodactylomorphi // Wilson D.E. & Reeder D.M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition. Vol.2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. P.1536-1537.
  • Dobson G.E. 1882. A Monograph of the Insectivora, Systematic and Anatomical. Pt. I. London: John van Voorst. 172 p.
  • Gambaryan P.P. 1960. [Adaptive features of the locomotor organs in fossorial mammals]. Erevan: Izdatel'stvo AN Armyanskoi SSR. 195 p. [in Russian]
  • Gambaryan P.P., Zherebtsova O.V. & Perepelova A.A. 2013. Comparative analysis of forelimb musculature in Laonastes aenigmamus (Rodentia: Diatomyidae) // Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS. Vol.317. No.3. P.226-245.
  • Green E.C. 1935. Anatomy of the rat // Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, N.S. Vol.27. P.1-370.
  • Hoffmann R.S. & Smith A.T. 2005. Order Lagomorpha. Family Ochotonidae // Wilson D.E. & Reeder D.M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition. Vol.1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. P.185-193.
  • Howell A.B. 1926. Anatomy of the Wood Rat. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins. 230 p.
  • Huchon D., Chevret P., Jordan U., Kilpatrick C.W., Ranwez V., Jenkins P.D., Brosius J. & Schmitz J. 2007. Multiple molecular evidences for a living mammalian fossil // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Vol.104. P.7495-7499.
  • Jenkins P.D., Kilpatrick C.W., Robinson M.F. & Timmins R.J. 2005. Morphological and molecular investigations of a new family, genus and species of rodent (Mammalia: Rodentia: Hystricognatha) from Lao PDR // Systematics and Biodiversity. Vol.2. No.4. P.419-454.
  • Jouffroy F.-K. 1971. Mammifères. Musculature des members // Traité de Zoologie: Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie. Vol.16. No.3. P.1-476.
  • Jullien R. 1967. Musculature du member anterieur chez les principaux types d'insectivores // Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Ser.A, Zoology. Vol.48. No.1. P.1-68.
  • Parsons F.G. 1894. On the myology of the sciuromorphine and hystricomorphine rodents // Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London. P.251-296.
  • Parsons F.G. 1898. The limb myology of Gymnura rafflesii // Journal of the Anatomy and Physiology. Vol.32. P.312-324.
  • Reed C.A. 1951. Locomotion and appendicular anatomy in three soricoid insectivores // American Midland Naturalist. Vol.45. No.3. P.513-671.
  • Rinker G.C. 1954. The comparative mycology of the mammalian genera Sigmodon, Oryzomys, Neotoma, and Peromyscus (Cricetinae), with remarks of their intergeneric relationships // Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan. No.83. P. 1-124.
  • Woods C.A. & Kilpatrick C.W. 2005. Suborder Hystricomorpha. Infraorder Hystricognathi // Wilson D.E. & Reeder D.M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition. Vol.2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. P.1538-1600.
  • Zherebtsova O.V. 2006. [Comparative morphological analysis of the forelimb musculature in erinaceids (Erinaceidae, Insectivora)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.80. No.5. P.586-598 [in Russian, with English summary].

Скачать PDF