Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Главная страница
Доступ к статьям
Электронная подача статей, правила для авторов и тп
Вход для рецензентов
Здесь можно подписаться на новостную рассылку RJT
Контактная информация

English version

Automated monitoring of vocal rutting activity in red deer (Cervus elaphus)
Volodin I.A., Volodina E.V., Golosova O.S.
P. 91-99
Vocal performances represent an important part of advertising male reproductive potential in red deer. Stag total vocal activity in rut period was studied on daily and weekly basis in two translocated herds of Siberian red deer Cervus elaphus sibiricus, kept at two farms in Central Russia (“Tver” and “Kostroma”). On both farms, stag rutting calls were recorded for 5 min each hour of a 24-hour period for the duration of 70-day rut period of 2013 using two automated recording systems, with simultaneous recording ambient temperature. Spectrographic analysis revealed that total number of calls was 30 times higher at Tver than at Kostroma (4341 and 145 calls respectively). Although the correlation between the daily average ambient temperatures in both farms was positive and highly significant, the average numbers of calls per hour did not correlate between herds. Over the course of the season, calling activity was single-humped at Tver and two-humped at Kostroma. In relation to daily activity patterns, the number of calls per hour had one peak between 18:00–09:00 at Tver and two peaks at Kostroma (between 07:00–09:00 and between 16:00–18:00). The estimation of the effect of ambient temperature together with the effect of the week during the rut and time of day revealed that temperature does not have a significant effect on the number of stag rutting calls in either herd. Substantial differences in stag vocal activity between the farms could be due to herd composition and time passed since translocation.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.15.2.03


  • Bobek B., Perzanowski K. & Zielinski J. 1986. Red deer population census in mountains: testing of an alternative method // Acta Theriologica. Vol.31. No.31. P.424–431.
  • Bocci A., Telford M. & Laiolo P. 2013. Determinants of the acoustic behaviour of red deer during breeding in a wild alpine population, and implications for species survey // Ethology, Ecology & Evolution. Vol.25. No.1. P.52–69.
  • Bowyer R.T. & Kitchen D.W. 1987. Sex and age-class differences in vocalizations of Roosevelt elk during rut // American Midland Naturalist. Vol.118. No.2. P.225–235.
  • Briefer E., Vannoni E. & McElligott A.G. 2010. Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal // BMC Biology. Vol.8. No.35. P.1–15.
  • Carranza J., Alvarez F. & Redondo T. 1990. Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer // Animal Behaviour. Vol.40. No.1. P.79–88.
  • Carranza J., Garcia-Munoz A.J. & Dios Vargas J. 1995. Experimental shifting from harem defense to territoriality in rutting red deer // Animal Behaviour. Vol.49. No.2. P.551–554.
  • Charlton B.D., McComb K. & Reby D. 2008a. Free-ranging red deer hinds show greater attentiveness to roars with formant frequencies typical of young males // Ethology. Vol.114. No.10. P.1023–1031.
  • Charlton B.D., Reby D. & McComb K. 2007a. Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males // Biology Letters. Vol.3. No.4. P.382–385.
  • Charlton B.D., Reby D. & McComb K. 2007b. Female perception of size-related formant shifts in red deer (Cervus elaphus) // Animal Behaviour. Vol.74. No.4. P.707–714.
  • Charlton B.D., Reby D. & McComb K. 2008b. Effect of combined source (F0) and filter (formant) variation on red deer hind responses to male roars // Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Vol.123. No.5. P.2936–2943.
  • Clutton-Brock T.H. & Albon S.D. 1979. The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertising // Beha¬viour. Vol.69. No.3–4. P.145–170.
  • Clutton-Brock T.H., Rose K.E. & Guinness F.E. 1997. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Vol.264. No.1387. P.1509–1516.
  • Cohen J. 1992. A power primer // Psychological Bulletin. Vol.112. No.1. P.155–159.
  • Della Libera M., Passilongo D. & Reby D. 2015. The acoustics of male rutting roars in the endangered population of Mesola red deer Cervus elaphus italicus // Mammalian Biology. Vol.80. No.5. P.395–400.
  • Douhard M., Bonenfant C., Gaillard J.-M., Hamann J.-L. & Jacques M.G. 2013. Roaring counts are not suitable for the monitoring of red deer Cervus elaphus population abundance // Wildlife Biology. Vol.19. No.1. P.94–101.
  • Fedosenko A.K. 1980. [The maral (ecology, behaviour, management)]. Alma-Ata: Nauka. 200 p. [in Russian].
  • Feighny J.J., Williamson K.E. & Clarke J.A. 2006. North American elk bugle vocalizations: male and female bugle call structure and context // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.87. No.6. P.1072–1077.
  • Frey R., Volodin I., Volodina E., Carranza J. & Torres-Porras J. 2012. Vocal anatomy, tongue protrusion behaviour and the acoustics of rutting roars in free-ranging Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) // Journal of Anatomy. Vol.220. No.3. P.271–292.
  • Fritz C.O., Morris P.E. & Richler J.J. 2012. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol.141. No.1. P.2–18.
  • Garcнa A.J., Landete-Castillejos T., Garde J.J. & Gallego L. 2002. Reproductive seasonality in female Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) // Theriogenology. Vol.58. No.8. P.1553–1562.
  • Guinness F., Lincoln G.A. & Short R.V. 1971. The reproductive cycle of the female red deer, Cervus elaphus L. // Reproduction. Vol.27. No.3. P.427–438.
  • Hurtado A.M., Smith-Flueck J.M. & Black-Decima P. 2012. Comparison of vocalisations of introduced European red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) in north-western Patagonia (Argentina) with native European populations // Animal Production Science. Vol.52. No.8. P.714–719.
  • Johnson K.G., Maloiy G.M.O. & Bligh J. 1972. Sweat gland function in the red deer (Cervus elaphus) // American Journal of Physiology. Vol.223. No.3. P.604–607.
  • Kidjo N., Cargnelutti B., Charlton B.D., Wilson C. & Reby D. 2008. Vocal behaviour in the endangered Corsican deer: description and phylogenetic implications // Bioacoustics. Vol.18. No.2. P.159–181.
  • Kim Y.H., Lee J.W., Chae S., Moon S.H., Do E.J., Oh S.E., Zhang G.J. & Lee M.Y. 2015. Development of a PCR-based assay to differentiate Cervus elaphus sibiricus from Cervus antlers // Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry. Vol.58. No.1. P.61–66.
  • Kuznetsova M.V., Danilkin A.A. & Kholodova M.V. 2012. Phylogeography of red deer (Cervus elaphus): analysis of mtDNA cytochrome b polymorphism // Biology Bulletin. Vol.39. No.4. P.323–330.
  • Llusia D., Marquez R. & Bowker R. 2011. Terrestrial sound monitoring systems, a methodology for quantitative calibration // Bioacoustics. Vol.20. No.3. P.277–286.
  • Lunitsin V.G. & Borisov N.P. 2012. [Deer management for velvet antlers production in Russia]. Barnaul: VNIIPO. 1000 p. [In Russian].
  • Lynch E., Northrup J.M., McKenna M.F., Anderson C.R., Angeloni L. & Wittemyer G. 2015 Landscape and anthropogenic features influence the use of auditory vigilance by mule deer // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.26. No.1. P.75–82.
  • McComb K. 1987. Roaring by red deer stags advances the date of oestrus in hinds // Nature. Vol.330. No.6149. P.648–649.
  • McPherson F.J. & Chenoweth P.J. 2012. Mammalian sexual dimorphism // Animal Reproduction Science. Vol.131. No.3–4. P.109–122.
  • Obrist M.K., Pavan G., Sueur J., Riede K., Llusia D. & Marquez R. 2010. Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories // Eymann J., Degreef J., Hдuser C., Monje J.C., Samyn Y. & VandenSpiegel D. (eds.). Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all taxa biodiversity inventories and monitoring. Vol.8. Part.1. Brussels: Abc Taxa. P.68–99.
  • Passilongo D., Reby D., Carranza J. & Apollonio M. 2013. Roaring high and low: composition and possible functions of the Iberian stag’s vocal repertoire // PLoS ONE. Vol.8. No.5. e63841.
  • Pepin D., Cargnelutti B., Gonzalez G., Joachim J. & Reby D. 2001. Diurnal and seasonal variations of roaring activity of farmed red deer stags // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. Vol.74. No.3. P.233–239.
  • Reby D., Andre-Obrecht R., Galinier A., Farinas G. & Cargnelutti B. 2006. Cepstral coefficients and hidden Markov models reveal idiosyncratic voice characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags // Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Vol.120. No.6. P.4080–4089.
  • Reby D. & McComb K. 2003a. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags // Animal Behaviour. Vol.65. No.3. P.519–530.
  • Reby D. & McComb K. 2003b. Vocal communication and reproduction in deer // Advances in the Study of Beha¬viour. Vol.33. P.231–264.
  • Reby D., McComb K., Cargnelutti B., Darwin C.J., Fitch W.T. & Clutton-Brock T.H. 2005. Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intra-sexual agonistic interactions // Proceedings of the Royal Society London. Series B. Vol.272. No.1566. P.941–947.
  • Smith B.L. 1994. Out-of-season births of elk calves in Wyoming // Prairie Naturalist. Vol.26. No.2. P.131–136.
  • Smith-Flueck J.M. & Flueck W.T. 2006. Defense of territories by rutting red deer stags, Cervus elaphus, in Patagonia, Argentina // Bartoљ L., Duљek A., Kotrba R. and Bartoљovб-Vнchovб J. (eds.). Advances in deer biology. Praha: Research Institute of Animal Production. P.174–178.
  • Stepanova V.V. 2010. Expansion of geographic range of red deer in Yakutia // Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. Vol.1. No.1. P.30–36.
  • Struhsaker T.T. 1968. The behavior of the elk (Cervus canadensis) during the rut // Zeitschrift fьr Tierpsychologie. Vol.24. No.1. P.80–114.
  • Volodin I.A., Matrosova V.A., Volodina E.V., Garcia A.J., Gallego L., Mбrquez R., Llusia D., Beltrбn J.F. & Landete-Castillejos T. 2015a. Sex and age-class differences in calls of Iberian red deer during the rut: reversed sex dimorphism of pitch and contrasting roars from farmed and wild stags // Acta Ethologica. Vol.18. No.1. P.19–29.
  • Volodin I.A., Sibiryakova O.V. & Volodina E.V. 2016. Sex and age-class differences in calls of Siberian wapiti Cervus elaphus sibiricus // Mammalian Biology. Vol.81. No.1. P.10–20.
  • Volodin I.A., Volodina E.V., Frey R. & Maymanakova I.L. 2013. Vocal activity and acoustic structure of the rutting calls of Siberian wapiti (Cervus elaphus sibiricus) and their imitation with a hunting luring instrument // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.12. No.2. P.99–106.
  • Volodin I.A., Volodina E.V., Sibiryakova O.V., Naidenko S.V., Hernandez-Blanco J.A., Litvinov M.N. & Rozhnov V.V. 2015b. Vocal activity of the red deer and the acoustic structure of its rutting calls in the Russian Far East // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.462. No.1. P.144–147.
  • Yoccoz N.G., Mysterud A., Langvatn R. & Stenseth N.C. 2002. Age- and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Vol.269. No.1500. P.1523–1528.

Скачать PDF