Diversity of snow voles of the “nivalis” group (<I>Chionomys</i>, Arvicolinae, Rodentia) in the eastern part of the range with a description of a new species

Golenishchev, F.N.; Malikov, V.G.; Bannikova, A.A.; Zykov, A.E.; Yiğit, N.; Çolak, E.

Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page

Diversity of snow voles of the “nivalis” group (Chionomys, Arvicolinae, Rodentia) in the eastern part of the range with a description of a new species
Golenishchev F.N., Malikov V.G., Bannikova A.A., Zykov A.E., Yiğit N., Çolak E.
P. 1-12
The genus Chionomys includes two supraspecific groups: “nivalis” and “gud-roberti”. For a long time, it has been thought that the nivalis group includes only C. nivalis. Here, molecular phylogenetic analysis of nine specimens from Turkey, Armenia, and Iran was performed using the Cytb gene and two nuclear genes: BRCA1 and GHR. In the results on Cytb, two specimens from central Taurus Mountains (Turkey), morphologically similar to C. nivalis, stood apart from all studied C. nivalis geographic forms at the species level (9–12%). Meanwhile, 38 km southwest from our collection site, there is known C. nivalis of the Caucasian–Asia Minor molecular-genetic clade. Hence, the form from central Taurus and common Asia Minor C. nivalis seem sympatric. Therefore, they are most likely genetically isolated from each other as separate species. A morphometric comparison of the Taurus specimens and C. nivalis from the eastern part of the geographic range was carried out by principal component analysis of 12 craniometric characteristics. In some craniometric characteristics, the type specimens of the new species are clearly larger than all subspecies of C. nivalis from the eastern part of the range, except C. n. layi. That is why we consider those two central-Taurus specimens a holotype and paratype of a new cryptic species: C. stekolnikovi sp. nov. In addition to the morphological diagnosis, we used data on amino acid substitutions in Cytb and nucleotide substitutions in BRCA1 and GHR.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.21.1.01

References

Abramson N.I., Bodrov S.Y., Bondareva O.V., Genelt- Yanovskiy E.A. & Petrova T.V. 2021. A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of voles and lemmings (Rodentia: Arvicolinae): Evolutionary and taxonomic implications // PLOS ONE. Vol.16. No.11. P.e0248198. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0248198

Arslan A., Arslan, E., Mahmoudi A., Bannikova A.A. & Kryštufek B. 2017. Taxonomic identity of Chionomys nivalis spitzenbergerae (Mammalia: Rodentia) // Zoology in the Middle East. Vol.63. No.1. P.1–7.

Bannikova A.A., Sighazeva A.M., Malikov V.G., Golenish- chev F.N. & Dzuev R.I. 2013. Genetic diversity of Chi- onomys genus (Mammalia, Arvicolinae) and comparative phylogeography of snow voles // Russian Journal of Genetics. Vol.49. No.5. P.561–575.

Bondareva O.V., Potapova N.A., Konovalov K.A., Petrova T.V. & Abramson N.I. 2021. Searching for signatures of positive selection in cytochrome b gene associated with subterra- nean lifestyle in fast-evolving arvicolines (Arvicolinae, Cricetidae, Rodentia) // BMC Ecology and Evolution. Vol.21. No.1. P.92. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01819-4

Ellerman J.R. 1941. The families and genera of living rodents. Vol.2. London: British Museum, Natural History. 690 p.

Hamidi K., Martin M.M., Jamshid D. & Malikov V.G. 2020. Inter- and intraspecific diversity of ontogeny and fecundity patterns in relation to reproductive strategy choice in Myo- morpha (Rodentia: Calomyscidae, Cricetidae, Muridae) // Mammal Research. Vol.65. P.277–288.

Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software package for Education and data analysis // Palaeontologia Electronica. Vol.4. No.1. P.1–9.

Jörger K.M. & Schrödl M. 2013. How to describe a cryptic species? Practical challenges of molecular taxonomy // Frontiers in Zoology. Vol.10. P.59.

Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B.Q., Wong T.K.F., von Haeseler A. & Jermiin L.S. 2017. Model Finder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates // Nature Methods. Vol.14. P.587–589.

Kryštufek B. & Vohralík V. 2005. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus. Vol.2. Rodentia I: Sciuridae, Dipodidae, Gliridae, Arvicolinae. Koper. 292 p.

Lebedev V.S., Bannikova A.A., Tesakov A.S. & Abramson N.I. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Alticola (Cricetidae, Rodentia) as inferred from the sequence of the cytochrome b gene // Zoologica Scripta. Vol.36. No.6. P.547–563.

Mahmoudi A., Kryštufek B., Aliabadian M., Moghaddam F.Y. & Darvish J. 2017. All quiet in the East: molecular analysis Retrieves Chionomys layi as part of C. nivalis // Folia Zoologica. Vol.66. No.1. P.67–71.

Malikov V.G. & Meyer M.N. 1990. The peculiarities of reproduction and postnatal development of the highland and lowland voles // Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS. Vol.25. P.23–33 [in Russian, with English summary].

Minh B.Q., Nguyen M.A.T. & von Haeseler, A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap // Molecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.30. No.5. P.1188–1195.

Nadachowski A. 1990. On the taxonomic status of Chionomys Miller, 1908 (Rodentia: Mammalia) from southern Anatolia (Turkey) // Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia. Vol.33. No.5. P.79–89.

Nadachowski A. 1991. Systematics, geographic variation, and evolution of snow voles (Chionomys) based on dental characters // Acta Theriologica. Vol.36. No.1. P.1–45.

Nadachowski A. 1992. Short-distance migration of Quaternary and recent mammals: a case study of Chionomys (Arvi- colidae) // Courier Forschungs- Institute Senckenberg. Vol.153. P.221–228.

Nguyen L.-T., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A. & Minh B.Q. 2015. IQTREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies // Molecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.32. No.1. P.268–274.

Ohdachi S. D., Dokuchaev N. E., Hasegawa M. & Masuda R. 2001. Intraspecific phylogeny and geographical variation of six species of northeastern Asiatic Sorex shrews based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences // Molecular Ecology. Vol.10. No.9. P.2199–2213.

Pavlinov I.Y. & Rossolimo O.L. 1987. [Systematics of mammals of USSR] // Archives Zoological Museum of Moscow State University. Vol.25. P.1–253 [in Russian].

Pavlinov I.Y. & Rossolimo O.L. 1998. [Systematics of mammals of USSR] // Archives Zoological Museum of Moscow state university. Vol.37. P.1–190 [in Russian].

Rambaut A. & Drummond A. 2005. Tracer version 1.5.Computer program distributed by the authors. Oxford: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. Available at: http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/software.html

Renner S.S. 2016. A return to Linnaeus’s focus on diagnosis, not description: the use of DNA characters in the formal naming of species // Systematic Biology. Vol.65. No.6. P.1085–1095.

Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space // Systematic Biology. Vol.61. No.3. P.539–542.

Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F. & Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 412 p.

Yannic G., Burri R., Malikov V.G. & Vogel P. 2012. Systematics of snow voles (Chionomys, Arvicolinae) revisited // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Vol.62. No.3. P.806–815.

Zykov A.E. 2004. [Review of snow voles (Rodentia, Arvicolinae, Chionomys) from Iran with description of new species from Zagros Mountains (Central Iran)] // Pratsi Zoologichnogo Muzeyu KNU. No.2. P.116–127 [in Ukrainian, with English summary].

Download PDF