Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page
Free access to the published articles
Information about online submission, Articles format, Instructions for authors etc
Instructions for reviewers
Subscription and prices
Contacts

Русскоязычный вариант сайта
The spermatozoa structure peculiarities of the subgenus Sumeriomys (Rodentia, Arvicolinae, Microtus)
Zorenko T.A., Golenishchev F.N.
P. 105-111
Owing to distinct differences in size and shape in different taxa, spermatozoa can be of a high diagnostic value. The functional and evolutionary nature of such diversity is poorly understood. The purpose of the study was to summarize the data on the differences in sperm design and linear parameters between the subgenera Sumeriomys and Microtus (the genus Microtus) and to carry out the same comparison between the “socialis” and “guentheri” groups of species within the subgenus Sumeriomys. We obtained the data on shape and size of spermatozoa in seven nominal forms of the subgenus Sumeriomys. The species of the subgenus Sumeriomys are quite similar in sperm design, which distinctly differs from that in the representatives of the subgenus Microtus. The spermatozoa of the Sumeriomys species also differ from those of the Microtus representatives in some linear measurements and quantitative indices. These data confirm the taxonomic distinctness of the social voles as an independent subgenus Sumeriomys. Within the subgenus Sumeriomys some essential differences were revealed in sperm dimensions. The largest spermatozoa are observed in the species of the “guentheri” group, especially in M. guentheri (a head length 7.60 mk). In M. hartingi they are slightly smaller in size (in two subspecies correspondingly 6.96 and 7.25 mk). In three nominal forms of the “socialis” group the spermatozoa are smaller (a head length 7.01–7.21 mk), than in the “guentheri” group. The ratio of head length to its width in M. guentheri and M. hartingi is respectively 1.5 and 1.46, while in the “socialis” group, 1.42–1.47. In voles of the subgenus Microtus it is 1.8–2.4. The length of the medium part of spermatozoon’s tail is the most variable character. The ratio of the sperm tail medium part length to head length in Microtus is higher than 2.8 (2.8–3.2), but in Sumeriomys it is lower than 2.8 (2.4–2.7).

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.14.1.05

References

  • Abramson N.I. & Lissovsky A.A. 2012. Subfamily Arvicolinae Gray, 1821 // Pavlinov I.Ya. & Lissovsky A.A. (eds.) The Mammals of Russia: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. (Archives of Zoological Museum of MSU. Vol.52. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P.220-276.

  • Aksenova T.G. 1973. [A structure of accessory sex glands in some species of grey voles of genus Microtus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.52. No.12. P.1843-1848 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Aksenova T.G. 1978. [The peculiarities of spermatozoa structure and their significans in systematic of grey voles (Rodentia, Microtus)] // Strelkov P.P. (ed.). Funktsionalnaya Morphologija i Sistematika Mlekopitajushikh. (Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR. Vol.79. Leningrad. P. 91-101 [in Russian].

  • Baker M.A., Krutskikh A., Curry B.J., Hetherington L. & Aitken R.J. 2005. Identification of cytochrome b5-reductase as the enzyme responsible for NADH-dependent lucigenin chemiluminescence in human spermatozoa // Biology of Reproduction. Vol.73. P.334-342.

  • Bierła J.B. 2006. Spermatogenesis and sperm morphology of European beaver (Caster fiber L.). Doctoral Thesis. Warsaw. Warsaw Agricultural University. 50 p.

  • Breed W.G. 2004. The spermatozoon of Eurasian murine rodents: its morphological diversity and evolution // Journal of Morphology. Vol.261. No.1. P.52-69.

  • Çolak E., Yigit, N., Sözen M. & Özkurt Ş. 1997. Distribution and taxonomic status of he genus Microtus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Southeastern Turkey // Israel Journal of Zoology. Vol.43. No.4. P.391-396.

  • Cummins J.M. & Woodall P.F. 1985. On mammalian sperm dimensions // Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Vol.75. P.153-175.

  • Eberhard W.G. 2009. Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. Vol.106. Sup.1. P.10025-10032.

  • Fawcett D.W. 1975. The mammalian spermatozoon // Developmental Biology. Vol.44. No.2. P.394-436.

  • Golenishchev F.N. & Abramson N.I. 2011. [New data on phylogeography of voles' subgenus Sumeriomys (Arvicolinae, Rodentia)] // Proceedings of IX Congress of Theriological Society RAS. Mammals of Russia and Adjacent Territories. 1-4 February 2011. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P.117 [in Russian].

  • Golenishchev F.N. & Malikov V.G. 2011. [The systematics and distribution of the grey voles of the tribe Microtini (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in the Caucasus and Asia Minor] // Proceeding of the International Conference Biological Diversity and Conservation Problems of the Fauna of the Caucasus. 26-29 September 2011. Yerevan, Armenia. P.101-105 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Golenishchev F.N., Malikov V.G., Nazari F., Vaziri A. Sh., Sablina O.V. & Polyakov A.V. 2003. New species of vole of guentheri group (Rodentia, Arvicolinae, Microtus) from Iran // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.1. No.2. P.117-123.

  • Golenishchev F.N., Sablina O.V., Borodin P.M. & Gerasimov S. 2002. Taxonomy of voles of the subgenus Sumeriomys Argyropulo, 1933 (Rodentia, Arvicolinae, Microtus) // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.1. No.1. P.43-55.

  • Gvozdetskii N.A. & Mikhailov N.I. 1987. [Physical Geography of the USSR. The Asian Part]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka. 448 p. [in Russian].

  • Kovalskaya Y.M. 2000. [Some characteristics of a hybrid between voles of the subgenera Microtus and Sumeriomys (Rodentia, Microtus)] // Agadjanian A.K. & Orlov V.N. (eds.) Systematic and Phylogeny of the Rodents and Lagomorphs. Moscow. P.73 [in Russian].

  • Kovalskaya Y.M., Aksenova T.G. & Savinetskaya L.E. 2011. [About experimental interspecific hybridization of voles genus Microtus: M. socialis × M.rossiaemeridionalis and M. arvalis obscurus] // Proceedings of IX Congress of Theriological Society RAS. Mammals of Russia and Adjacent Territories. 1-4 February 2011. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P.226 [in Russian].

  • Kryštufek B., Zorenko T. & Buzan E. 2012. New insights into taxonomy and phylogeny of social voles inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences // Mammalian Biology. Vol.77. No.3. P.178-182.

  • Malygin V.M. 1983. [Systematic of Common vVoles]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Nauka. 208 p. [in Russian].

  • Medarde N., Muñoz-Muñoz F., López-Fuster M.J. & Ventura J. 2013. Variational modularity at the cell level: insights from the sperm head of the house mouse // BMC Evolutionary Biology. Vol.13. P.179.

  • Meyer M. N., Orlov V.N. & Skhol E.D. 1972. [Sibling species in group Microtus arvalis (Rodentia, Cricetidae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.51. No.5. P.724-738 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Meyer M.N., Golenishchev F.N., Radjably S.I. & Sablina O.V. 1996. [Voles (Subgenus Microtus Schrank) of Russia and Adjacent Territories]. (Proceeding of the Zoological Institute. Vol.232. Sankt-Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. 319 p. [in Russian]

  • Miki K., Qu W., Goulding E.H, Willis W.D., Bunch D.O., Strader L.F., Perreault S.D., Eddy E.M. & O'Brien D.A. 2004. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase-S, a sperm specific glycolytic enzyme is required for sperm motility and male fertility // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol.101. No.47. P. 16501-16506.

  • Pitnick S., Hosken D.J. & Birkhead T.R. 2009. Sperm morphological diversity // Birkhead T.R., Hosken D.J. & Pitnick S. (eds.). Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. P.69-149.

  • Sánchez M.V., Bastir M. & Roldan E.R.S. 2013. Geometric morphometrics of rodent sperm head shape // PLoS ONE. Vol.8. No.11. P.1-10.

  • Schärer L., Littlewood D.T.J., Waeschenbach A., Yoshida W. & Vizoso D. 2011. Mating behavior and the evolution of sperm design // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. Vol.108. No.4. P. 1490-1495.

  • Shenbrot G.I. & Krasnov B.R. 2005: An atlas of the geographic distribution of the Arvicoline rodents of the world (Rodentia, Muridae: Arvicolinae). Sofia: Pensoft Publishers. 336 p.

  • Simsek N. 1981. The importance of the phallus in distinguishing Microtus socialis Pallas and Microtus guentheri Danford and Alston (Mammalia Rodentia) in Turkey // Communications Faculte Sciences de l'Universite d'Ankara. Ser. C: Zoologie. Vol.25. P.1-10.

  • Yiģit N. & Çolak E. 2002. On the distribution and taxonomic status of Microtus guentheri Danford and Alston, 1880 and Microtus lydius Blackler, 1916 (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey // Turkish Journal of Zoology. Vol.26. No.2. P.197-204.

  • Zhabin C.G., Artifeksov S.B., Nagaytsev V.M., Artifeksova M.S., Treshchenkov E.A. & Pavlenko I.I. 2010. [Modern ideas of maturing of spermatozoa in an epididymis of testis] // Problemi Reprodukciji [Russian Journal of Human Reproduction]. No.2. P.66-73 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Zorenko T.A. 2000. [Morphology of genitals and sexual behavior of social voles of the subgenus Sumeriomys (Arvicolinae, Microtus)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.79. No.8. P.990-999 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Zorenko T.A. 2012. [The taxonomical status of the social vole from Kopet Dagh] // Abstracts of Conference. Aktual'nie Problemi Sovremennoi Teriologii. Novosibirsk. 18-22 September 2012. P.51 [in Russian].

  • Zorenko T. 2013. [Social Voles of the Subgenus Sumeriomys: Systematics, Biology and Behaviour]. Saarbrücken: Palmariun Academic Publishing. 541 p. [in Russian].

  • Zorenko T.A. & Aksenova T.G. 1989. [Structure of genitals, sexual behavior and problem of isolating mechanisms in voles' tribe Microtini] // Aktual'nie Problemi Zoologii. Riga: LGU. P.111-132 [in Russian].

  • Zorenko T. & Motmilere I. 2005. [On what the reproductive success of males of the social vole depends?] // Proceedings of International Conference Behaviour and Behavioral Ecology of Mammals. 4-8 October 2005. Chernogolovka, Russia. P.245-248 [in Russian].

  • Zorenko T., Motmillere I. & Matjuskova N. 2005. Does the feeding with mushroom shiitake increase reproductive capacity of mammals? // Abstracts of the 3-rd International Symposium Physiological Bases for Increasing the Productivity of Mammals Introduced in Zooculture. 27-29 September 2005. Petrozavodsk. P.72-75.

  • Zykov A.E. & Zagorodnyuk I.V. 1988. [On the systematic position of voles (Mammalia, Rodentia) from Kopet Dagh] // Vestnik Zoologii. Vol.5. P.46-52 [in Russian, with English summary].

Download PDF