References

• Alpeev M.A., Alferova A.V., Ruchin A.B., Esin M.N., Lukyanov S.V., Lobachev E.A., Semishin G.B. & Bystrakova N.V. 2025. [New information on the fauna of small mammals trapped in soil (2021–2023)] // Proceedings of the National Park “Smolny”. Vol.9. P.101–104 [in Russian].
• Bannikova A.A., Jenkins P.D., Lebedev V.S., Pavlova S.V., Yakushov V.D., Raspopova A.A., Zhu Y., Fang Y., Sun Y-H. & Sheftel B.I. 2025. The morphological, chromosomal and molecular illumination of the dramatic diversity of the stripe-backed shrews, Sorex cylindricauda species complex (Eulipotyphla: Soricidae) // Vertebrate Zoology. Vol.75. P.227–243. DOI: 10.3897/vz.75.e153115
• Bannikova A.A., Lebedev V.S., Kramerov D.A. & Zaitsev M.V. 2006. Phylogeny and systematics of the Crocidura suaveolens species group: corroboration and controversy between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers // Mammalia. Vol.70. No.2. P.106–119. DOI: 10.1515/MAMM.2006.011
• Balčiauskas L. & Balčiauskienė L. 2012. Mediterranean water shrew, Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 – a new mammal species for Lithuania // North-Western Journal of Zoology. No.8. P.367–369.
• Balčiauskas L., Balčiauskienė L. & Timm U. 2016. Mediterranean water shrew (Neomys anomalus): range expansion northward // Turkish Journal of Zoology. Vol.40. P.103–111.
• Balmori-de la Puente A., Nores C., Román J., Fernandez-Gonzalez A., Aymerich P., Gosálbez J., Escoda L. & Castresana J. 2019. Size increase without genetic divergence in the Eurasian water shrew Neomys fodiens // Scientific Reports. Vol.9. No.1. Art.e17375. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53891-y
• Bolfíková B. & Hulva P. 2012. Microevolution of sympatry: Landscape genetics of hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and E. roumanicus in Central Europe // Heredity. Vol.108. P.248–255. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.67
• Borodin P.L. 2013. [Mediterranean water shrew in the Mordovskiy Nature Reserve] // Proceeding of the Mordovskiy State Reserve. Vol.11. P.109–124 [in Russian].
• Campos P.F. & Gilbert T.M.P. 2012. DNA extraction from formalin-fixed material // Shapiro B. & Hofreiter M. (eds.). Ancient DNA: methods and protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol.840. P.81–85. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_11
• Castiglia R., Annesi F., Aloise G. & Amori G. 2007. Mitochondrial DNA reveals different phylogeographic structures in the water shrews Neomys anomalus and N. fodiens (Insectivora: Soricidae) in Europe // Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. Vol.45. No.3. P.255–262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2006.00391.x
• Černá Bolfíková B., Eliášová K., Loudová M., Kryštufek B., Lymberakis P., Sándor A.D. & Hulva P. 2017. Glacial allopatry vs. postglacial parapatry and peripatry: the case of hedgehogs // PeerJ. Vol.5. Art.e3163. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3163
• Clement M., Snell Q., Walker P., Posada D. & Crandall K. 2002. TCS: estimating gene genealogies // Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society. Vol.2. P.184. DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2002.1016585
• Curto M., Winter S., Seiter A., Schmid L., Scheicher K., Barthel L.M.F., Plass J. & Meimberg H. 2019. Application of a SSR-GBS marker system on investigation of European hedgehog species and their hybrid zone dynamics // Ecology and Evolution. Vol.9. P.2814–2832. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4960
• Dubey S., Diker E., Kurtonur C. & Vogel P. 2008. Secondary contact zones and hybridizations: the case of the lesser white-toothed shrew (Crocidura suaveolens group, Soricidae) // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.95. No.3. P.557–565.
• Eliášová K., Lucas Lledó J.I., Grau J.H., Loudová M., Bannikova A.A., Zolotareva K.I., Beneš V., Hulva P. & Černá Bolfíková B. 2022. Contrasting levels of hybridization across the two contact zones between two hedgehog species revealed by genome-wide SNP data // Heredity (Edinb). Vol.129. No.5. P.305–315. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-022-00567-5
• Ermakov O.A. 2025. Miller’s water shrew Neomys milleri // Lissovsky A.A., Stakheev V.V., Saveljev A.P., Ermakov O.A., Smirnov D.G., Glazov D.M., Obolenskaya E.V., Sheftel B.I. & Titov S.V. (eds.). [Atlas of Mammal Distribution in the European Part of Russia]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P.78–79 [in Russian].
• Ermakov O.A., Mishta A.V., Sheftel B.I., Obolenskaya E.V., Lada G.A., Bystrakova N.V., Ruchin A.B. & Lissovsky A.A. 2020. Does the Mediterranean water shrew Neomys anomalus (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) expand the eastern part of the distribution range? // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.19. No.2. P.112–130. DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.19.2.02
• Fu X.Y. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection // Genetics. Vol.147. P.915–925. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915
• Gazzard A. 2024. Neomys fodiens. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T29658A226862036. Accessed on 15 November 2025. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2024-2.RLTS.T29658A226862036.en
• Gazzard A. & Meinig H. 2023. Neomys milleri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: e.T221738646A221738688. Accessed on 06 November 2024. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2023-1.RLTS.T221738646A221738688.en
• Gritsyshin V.A., Lisenkova A.A., Speranskaya A.S., Artyushin I.V., Sheftel B.I., Lebedev V.S. & Bannikova A.A. 2023. Multilocus analysis of phylogenetic relationships in the Crocidura suaveolens sensu lato species complex: a comparison with mitochondrial data // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.509. P.128–134. DOI: 10.1134/S0012496623700308
• İbiş O., Koepfli K.P., Özcan S. & Tez C. 2023. Whole mitogenomes of Turkish white-toothed shrews, genus Crocidura (Eulipotyphla: Soricidae), with new insights into the phylogenetic positions of Crocidura leucodon and the Crocidura suaveolens group // Organisms Diversity & Evolution. Vol.23. P.221–241. DOI: 10.1007/s13127-022-00579-3
• Igea J., Aymerich P., Bannikova A.A., Gosálbez J. & Castresana J. 2015. Multilocus species trees and species delimitation in a temporal context: application to the water shrews of the genus Neomys // BMC Evolutionary Biology. Vol.15. No.209. P.1–16. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0485-z
• Keckel M.R., Ansorge H. & Stefen C. 2014. Differences in the microhabitat preferences of Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771) and Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 in Saxony, Germany // Acta Theriologica. Vol.59. P.485–494. DOI: 10.1007/s13364-014-0189-6
• Korol’kov M.A. 2025. [Eurasian water shrew Neomys fodiens Pennant, 1771] // Korepov M.V., Maslennikov A.V. & Volkova Ju.S. (eds.). [Red Book of the Ulyanovsk Region]. Ulyanovsk: NITS “Povolzhye”. P.605 [in Russian].
• Koryavchenkov D.M. 2017. [Mediterranean water shrew Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907] // Antokhina V.A. (ed.). [Red Book of the Kaluga Region. Vol.2. Animals]. Kaluga: OOO Vash dom. P.334 [in Russian].
• Kryštufek B. & Vohralík V. 2001. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus. Introduction, Checklist, Insectivora. Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko, Znanstveno-raziskovalno stredišče Republice Slovenije Koper. 140 p.
• Kumar S., Stecher G. & Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 // Molecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.33. P.1870–1874. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
• Kunerth H.D., Tapisso J.T., Valente R., Mathias M.d.L., Alves P.C., Searle J.B., Vega R. & Paupério J. 2022. Characterising mitochondrial capture in an Iberian shrew // Genes. Vol.13. No.12. P.2228. DOI: 10.3390/genes13122228
• Leigh J.W. & Bryant D. 2015. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction // Methods of Ecology and Evolution. Vol.6. P.1110–1116. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12410
• Lissovsky A.A., Shakula G.V. & Obolenskaya E.V. 2024. Geographic distribution and ecological niche divergence of the Palaearctic petrophilous pikas (Ochotona, Lagomorpha, Mammalia) of the subgenus Pika // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.23. No.2. P.114–125. DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.23.2.02
• Loy A., Capula M., Palombi A. & Capanna E. 2001. Genetic and morphometric evidence of introgression between two species of moles (Insectivora: Talpa europaea and Talpa romana) in central Italy // Journal of Zoology. Vol.254. No.2. P.229–238. DOI: 10.1017/S0952836901000747
• Lukiyanov S. & Lobachev E. 2023. Neomys milleri. https://rusmam.ru/data/view?id=295523. Mammals of Russia. Uploaded by: Oleg Ermakov 24.12.2024.
• Mishta A.V. 2003. [Shrews (Soricidae, Mammalia) of the Desnyansko-Starogutsky National Natural Park] // [The role of nature reserves in the maintenance of biodiversity] (Proceedings of the conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Kaniv Nature Reserve, Kaniv, September 9–11, 2003). Kaniv. P.250–252 [in Russian].
• Neves T., Tapisso J.T., Gabriel S.I., Rychlik L., Ramalhinho M.G., Borda-de-Água L., Mishta A. & Mathias M.L. 2025. The Rise (and fall?) of European water shrews: phylogeography and species distribution models uncover the impact of climate change // Journal of Biogeography. Vol.52. No.5. Art.e15073. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.15073
• Querejeta M. & Castresana J. 2018. Evolutionary history of the endemic water shrew Neomys anomalus: Recurrent phylogeographic patterns in semi-aquatic mammals of the Iberian Peninsula // Ecology and Evolution. Vol.8. No.20. P.10138–10146. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4487
• Ramos-Onsins S.E. & Rozas J. 2002. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth // Molecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.19. P.2092–2100. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004034
• Raspopova A.A., Lebedev V.S., Searle J.B. & Bannikova A.A. 2023. Discordant phylogenies in the Sorex araneus group (Soricidae, Mammalia): Footprints of past reticulations? // Zoologica Scripta. Vol.52. No.4. P.331–344. DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12590
• Rozas J., Ferrer-Mata A., Sánchez-DelBarrio J.C., Guirao-Rico S., Librado P., Ramos-Onsins S.E. & Sánchez-Gracia A. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of large data sets // Molecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.34. P.3299–3302. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx248
• Rychlik L. 2000. Habitat preferences of four sympatric species of shrews // Acta Theriologica. Vol.45. P.173–190. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.00-72
• Savarin A. & Savarina V. 2019. The Mediterranean water shrew (Neomys anomalus) in northern Belarus: new records and identification criteria // Theriologia Ukrainica. Vol.18. P.137–143.
• Sęk O., Al Belbeisi R. & Rychlik L. 2023. Differentiation of activity rhythms and space use between two competing water shrew species in a laboratory experiment // Mammal Research. Vol.68. P.427–435. DOI: 10.1007/s13364-023-00675-5
• Stephens M., Smith N.J. & Donnelly P. 2001. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data // American Journal of Human Genetics. Vol.68. P.978–989. DOI: 10.1086/319501
• Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism // Genetics. Vol.123. No.3. P.585–595. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585
• Wikar Z., Ciechanowski M. & Zwolicki A. 2024. The positive response of small terrestrial and semi-aquatic mammals to beaver damming // Science of the Total Environment. Vol.906. Art.167568. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167568
• Zaitsev M.V., Voyta L.L. & Sheftel B.I. 2014. [The Mammals of Russia and Adjacent Territories. Lipotyphlans.] Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 391 p. [in Russian].
• Zolotareva K.I., Belokon M.M., Belokon Y.S., Rutovskaya M.V., Hlyap L.A., Starykov V.P., Politov D.V., Lebedev V.S. & Bannikova A.A. 2021. Genetic diversity and structure of the hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and Erinaceus roumanicus: evidence for ongoing hybridization in Eastern Europe // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.132. No.1. P.174–195. DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blaa135

Download PDF