References

• Abbot P., Abe J., Alcock J., Alizon S., Alpedrinha J.A.C., Andersson M., Andre J.-B., van Baalen M., Balloux F. et al. 2011. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality // Nature. Vol.471. P.e1–e4.
• Ågren G., Zhou Q. & Zhong W. 1989a. Ecology and social behaviour of Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, at Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China // Animal Behaviour. Vol.37. P.11–27.
• Ågren G., Zhou Q. & Zhong W. 1989b. Territoriality, cooperation and resource priority: hoarding in the Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus // Animal Behaviour. Vol.37. P.28–32.
• Alexander R.D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior // Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. Vol.5. P.325–383.
• Alexander R.D., Nonan K.M. & Crespi B.J. 1991. The evolution of eusociality // Sherman P.W., Jarvis J.U.M. & Alexander R.D. (eds.). The Biology of the Naked Mole-rat. Princeton: Princeton University Press. P.3–44.
• Allen B., Nowak M.A. & Wilson E.O. 2013. Limitations of inclusive fitness // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Vol.110. P.20135–20139.
• Andrews R.V. & Belknap R.W. 1986. Bioenergetic benefits of huddling by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) // Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology, A. Vol.85. P.775–778.
• Armitage K.B. 1981. Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels // Oecologia (Berlin). Vol.48. P.36–49.
• Armitage K.B. 2007. Evolution of sociality in marmots: It begins with hibernation // Wolff J.O. & Sherman P.W. (eds.). Rodent societies: an ecological & evolutionary perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P.356–367.
• Arnold W. 1993. Energetics of social hibernation // Carey C., Florant G.L., Wunder B.A. & Boulder H.B. (eds.). Life in the Cold: Ecological, physiological and molecular mechanisms. Colorado: Westview Press. P.65–80.
• Axelrod R. & Hamilton W.D. 1981. The evolution of cooperation // Science. Vol.211. P.1390–1396.
• Baack J.K. & Switzer P.V. 2000. Alarm calls affect foraging behavior in Eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus, Rodentia: Sciuridae) // Ethology. Vol.106. P.1057–1066.
• Bednekoff P.A. 1997. Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game // American Naturalist. Vol.150. P.373–392.
• Bednekoff P.A. & Lima S.L. 1998. Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behavior // Proceedings of the Royal Society, B. Vol.265. P.2021–2026.
• Blumstein D.T. 2007. The evolution of alarm communication in rodents: Structure, function, and the puzzle of apparently altruistic calling // Wolff J.O & Sherman P.W. (eds.). Rodent societies: an ecological & evolutionary perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P.317–327.
• Blumstein D.T. & Armitage K.B. 1997. Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? A comparative test with ground-dwelling sciurid alarm calls // American Naturalist. Vol.150. P.179–200.
• Blumstein D.T. & Arnold W. 1998. Ecology and social behavior of golden marmots (Marmota caudata aurea) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.79. P.873–886.
• Blumstein D.T. & Daniel J.C. 2004. Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate among the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to the calls from pups // Animal Behaviour. Vol.68. P.1257–1265.
• Blumstein D.T., Ebensperger L.A. & Hayes L.D., Vásquez R.A., Ahern T.H., Burger J.R., Dolezal A.G., Dosmann A., González-Mariscal G., Harris B.N., Herrera E.A., Lacey E.A., Mateo J., McGraw L.A., Olazábal D., Ramenofsky M., Rubenstein D.R., Sakhai S.A., Saltzman W., Sainz-Borgo C., Soto-Gamboa M., Stewart M.L., Wey T.W., Wingfield J.C. & Young L.J. 2010. Towards the integrative understanding of social behavior: new models and new opportunities // Frontiers of Behavioral Neuroscience. Vol.4. P.1–9.
• Blumstein D.T., Steinmetz J., Armitage K.B. & Daniel J.C. 1997. Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: II. The importance of direct fitness // Animal Behaviour. Vol.53. P.173–184.
• Bourke A.F.G. 2011. The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory // Proceedings of the Royal Society, B. Vol.278. P.3313–3320.
• Bourke A.F.G. 2014. Hamilton’s rule and the causes of social evolution // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B. Vol.369. P.20130362–20130362.
• Brady C.A. & Svendsen G.E. 1981. Social behaviour in a family of beaver, Castor canadensis // Biology of Behavior. Vol.6. P.99–114.
• Brown R.Z. 1953. Social behavior, reproduction, and populations changes in the house mouse (Mus musculus L.) // Ecological Monographs. Vol.23. P.217–240.
• Bujalska G. & Saitoh T. 2000. Territoriality and its consequences // Polish Journal of Ecology. Vol.48(Suppl.). P.37–49.
• Burke da Silva K., Kramer D.L. & Weary D.M. 1994. Context-specific alarm calls of the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.72. P.1087–1092.
• Busher P. 2007. Social organization and monogamy in the beaver // Wolff J.O & Sherman P.W. (eds.). Rodent societies: an ecological & evolutionary perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P.280–290.
• Busher P.E., Warner R.J. & Jenkins S.H. 1983. Population density, colony composition, and local movements in two Sierra-Nevadan beaver populations // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.64. P.314–318.
• Calhoun J.B. 1963. The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. Public Health Service Publication, No.1008. Washington: Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 288 p.
• Charnov E.L. 1977. An elementary treatment of the genetical theory of kin selection // Journal of Theoretical Biology. Vol.66. P.541–550.
• Charnov E.L. & Finerty J.P. 1980. Vole population cycles: A case for kin selection? // Oecologia. Vol.45. P.1–2.
• Charnov E.L. & Krebs J.R. 1975. The evolution of alarm calls: Altruism or manipulation? // American Naturalist. Vol.109. P.107–112.
• Clutton-Brock T.H. 2002. Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates // Science. Vol.296. P.69–72.
• Clutton-Brock T.H. 2009. Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies // Nature. Vol.462. P.51–57.
• Corbet N.U. & van Aarde R.J. 1996. Social organization and space use in the Cape porcupine in a southern African savanna // African Journal of Ecology. Vol.34. P.1–14.
• Davies N.B., Krebs J.R. & West S.A. 2012. An introduction to behavioural ecology. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. 586 p.
• Davis L.S. 1984. Alarm calling in Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) // Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. Bd.66. S.152–164.
• Dezhkin V.V., D’jakov Y.V. & Safonov V.G. 1986. [The castor.] Moscow: Agropromizdat. 256 p. [in Russian].
• Dunford C. 1977. Kin selection for ground squirrel alarm calls // American Naturalist. Vol.111. P.782–785.
• Ebensperger L.A. & Bozinovic F. 2000. Communal burrowing in the hystricognath rodent, Octodon degus: A benefit of sociality? // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.47. P.365–369.
• Ebensperger L.A. & Hayes L.D. 2016. Causes and evolution of group-living // Ebensperger L.A. & Hayes L.D. (eds.). Sociobiology of Caviomorph Rodents: An Integrative Approach, First Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. P.173–200.
• Ebensperger L.A., Hurtado M., Soto-Gamboa M., Lacey E. & Chang A. 2004. Communal nesting and kinship in degus (Octodon degus) // Naturwissenschaften. Vol.91. P.391–395.
• Ebensperger L.A., Hurtado M. & León C. 2007. An experimental examination of the consequences of communal versus solitary breeding on maternal condition and the early postnatal growth and survival of degu, Octodon degus, pups // Animal Behaviour. Vol.73. P.185–194.
• Ebensperger L.A., Ramírez-Estrada J., León C., Castro R.A., Tolhuysen L.O., Sobrero R., Quirici V., Burger J.R., Soto-Gamboa M. & Hayes L.D. 2011. Sociality, glucocorticoids and direct fitness in the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus // Hormones and Behavior. Vol.60. P.346–352.
• Emlen S.T. 1991. Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals // Krebs J.R. & Davies N.B. (eds.). Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. London: Blackwell Scientific. P.301–335.
• Emlen S.T., Reeve H.K., Sherman P.W., Wrege P.H., Ratnieks F.L.W. & Shellman-Reeve J. 1991. Adaptive versus nonadaptive explanations of behavior: the case of alloparental helping // American Naturalist. Vol.138. P.259–270.
• Frank S.A. 2003. Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation // Evolution. Vol.57. P.693–705.
• Frank S.A. 2013. Natural selection. VII. History and interpretation of kin selection theory // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Vol.26. P.1151–1184.
• French J.A. 1994. Alloparents in the Mongolian gerbil: impact on long-term reproductive performance of breeders and opportunities for independent reproduction // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.5. P.273–279.
• Galef B.G. & Wigmore S.W. 1983. Transfer of information concerning distant foods: a laboratory investigation of the “information centre hypothesis” // Animal Behaviour. Vol.31. P.748–758.
• Gardner A., Griffin A.S. & West S.A. 2010. Altruism and cooperation // Westneat D.F. & Fox C.W. (eds.). Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. New York: Oxford University Press. P.308–326.
• Garson P.J. 1975. Social interactions of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) studied by direct observation in the wild // Journal of Zoology. Vol.177. P.496–500.
• Getz L.L. & Carter C.S. 1980. Social organization in Microtus ochrogaster populations // The Biologist. Vol.62. P.56–69.
• Getz L.L. & Hofmann J.E. 1986. Social organization in free-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.18. P.275–282.
• Getz L.L., McGuire B., Pizzuto T., Hofmann J.E. & Frase B. 1993. Social organization of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.74. P.44–58.
• Grafen A. 1984. Natural selection, kin selection, and group selection // Krebs J.R. & Davies N.B. (eds.). Behavioral Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. P.62–84.
• Gromov V.S. 2000. [Ethological mechanisms of population homeostasis in gerbils (Mammalia, Rodentia)]. Moscow: IPEE Press. 216 p. [in Russian].
• Gromov V.S. 2005. Parental care in captive Brandt’s vole (Lasiopodomys brandti) // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.4. No.1. P.137–145.
• Gromov V.S. 2007. Parental care in captive social voles Microtus socialis // Zoologicheski Zhurnal. Vol.86. No.11. P.1389–1397 [in Russian].
• Gromov V.S. 2008. [The spatial-and-ethological population structure in rodents]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 586 p. [in Russian].
• Gromov V.S. 2010. Interactions in family pairs and parental care in captive steppe lemming (Lagurus lagurus) // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. Vol.3. No.1. P.1–7.
• Gromov V.S. 2011. Biparental care, tactile stimulation, and evolution of sociality in rodents // Journal of Evolutionary Biology Research. Vol.3. P.33–43.
• Gromov V.S. 2013. Care of young and the effect of the presence of a male on parental behavior of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in captivity // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. Vol.6. No.3. P.330–335.
• Gromov V.S. 2017. The spatial-and-ethological population structure, cooperation, and the evolution of sociality in rodents // Behaviour. Vol.154. P.609–649.
• Gromov V.S. 2018. The evolution of sociality in rodents: Environments and selective forces promoting grouping. Mauritius: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. 163 p.
• Gromov V.S. 2020. Epigenetic programming of phenotypic differences in behaviour and the evolution of sociality in rodents // Biology Bulletin Reviews. Vol.10. No.4. P.338–350.
• Gromov V.S. 2021. Relationship between the social structure and potential reproductive success in muroid rodents // Biology Bulletin. Vol.48. P.1740–1746.
• Gromov V.S. 2022. Ecology and social behaviour of the Mongolian gerbil: A generalised review // Behaviour. Vol.159. P.403–441.
• Gromov V.S. 2023a. Alloparental care in social muroid rodents // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.22. No.2. P.150–161.
• Gromov V.S. 2023b. Ecology and social behaviour of the social vole Microtus socialis: A generalized review // Current Zoology. Vol.69. P.775–783.
• Gromov V.S. 2023c. Ecology and social behavior of the Brandt’s vole: A generalized review // Journal of Arid Environment. Vol.214. P.e104994. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2023.104994

Download PDF