Supplement 1

References

• Abramson N.I. & Lissovsky A.A. 2012. Subfamily Arvicolinae // Pavlinov I.Y. & Lissovsky A.A. (eds.). The mammals of Russia: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Archives of Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Vol.52. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. P.127–141.
• Baranovsky P.M. & Okhotsky Yu.V. 1988. [Territory use, diurnal activity and mobility of sibling species Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis in joint colonies] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.67. No.7. P.1090–1094 [in Russian].
• Baranovsky P.M., Bogomolov P.L., Karaseva E.V. & Demidova T.N. 1994. [Distribution of the East-European and common voles] // Sokolov V.E. & Karaseva E.V. (eds.). Sinantropiya gryzunov. Moscow: IEMEZH RAN. P.77–87 [in Russian].
• Bashenina N.V., Graevskaya B.M., Zolotareva N.N., Lenets L.I., Malygin V.M. & Mosin A.F. 1988. [Biochemical, ecological, and physiological characteristics of the twin species of the voles Microtus arvalis] // Volskis R.S. (ed.). [The Species Place among Biological Systems]. Vilnus: Institute of Zoology and Parasitology of the Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SSR. P.18–44 [in Russian].
• Bashlykova L.A. & Korolev A.N. 2014. [Records of common (Microtus arvalis) and Eastern European (Microtus rossiaemeridionalis) voles in the central part of the Komi Republic] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.93. No.11. P.1375–1380 [in Russian].
• Bobrov V.V., Warshavsky A.A. & Khlyap L.A. 2008. [Alien Mammals in the Ecosystems of Russia]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 232 p. [in Russian].
• Bol’shakov V.N. & Shubnikova V.N. 1988. [Common vole Microtus arvalis (Rodentia, Muridae) on the Svalbard archipelago] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.67. No.2. P.308–310 [in Russian].
• Boyko N.S. 2003. Microtus arvalis. https://rusman.ru/data/view?id=114437 . Mammals of Russia. Uploaded by Andrey Lissovsky 05.03.2021.
• Brown J.L. & Carnaval A.C. 2019. A tale of two niches: methods, concepts, and evolution // Frontiers of Biogeography. Vol.11. No.4. P.e44158.
• Bulatova N.Sh. & Emel’yanova L.G. 2018. [New information on the habitats of cryptic taxa of common voles (Arvicolini, Rodentia) by chromosomal markers] // Proceedings of International Conference “Current Biogeography Issues”. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. P.68–69 [in Russian].
• Bulatova N.Sh., Golenishchev F.N., Koval’skaya Yu.M., Emel’yanova L.G., Bystrakova N.V., Pavlova S.V., Nadzhafova R.S. & Lavrenchenko L.A. 2010. Cytogenetic study of the parapatric contact zone between two 46-chromosomal forms of the common vole in European Russia // Russian Journal of Genetics. Vol.46. P.443–448.
• Canestrelli D., Bisconti R. & Carere C. 2016. Bolder takes all? The behavioral dimension of biogeography // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol.31. No.1. P.35–43.
• Dobrohotov B.P., Baranovsky P.M. & Demidova T.N. 1985. [Peculiarities of stationary distribution of sibling species of the common vole Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis (Rodentia, Microtinae) and their role in natural foci of meadow field type tularemia] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.64. No.2. P.269–275 [in Russian].
• Fredga K., Jaarola M., Anker Ims R., Steen H. & Yoccoz N.G. 1990. The “common vole” in Svalbard identified as Microtus epiroticus by chromosome analysis // Polar Research. Vol.8. No.2. P.283–290.
• Karaseva E.V., Telitsina A.Y. & Samoilov B.L. 1999. [Mammals of Moscow in the Past and Present]. Moscow: Nauka. 244 p. [in Russian].
• Karger D.N., Conrad O., Böhner J., Kawohl T., Kreft H., Soria-Auza R.W., Zimmermann N.E., Linder H.P. & Kessler M. 2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas // Scientific Data. Vol.4. No.1. P.170122.
• Kartavtseva I.V., Tiunov M.P., Lapin A.S., Vysochina N.P. & Ryabkova A.V. 2012. Invasion of Microtus rossiaemeridionalis into the territory of the Russian Far East // Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. Vol.3. P.11–15.
• Kass J.M., Muscarella R., Galante P.J., Bohl C.L., Pinilla-Buitrago G.E., Boria R.A., Soley-Guardia M. & Anderson R.P. 2021. “ENMeval 2.0: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species’ niches and distributions. // Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.12. P.1602–1608.
• Khlyap L.A. & Warshavsky A.A. 2010. Synanthropic and agrophilic rodents as invasive alien mammals // Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. Vol.1. P.301–312.
• Kucheruk V.V. & Rubina M.A. 1953. [Reasons for determining the species composition and number of rodents in stacks of straw and haystacks of southern zones of the Moscow oblast] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.32. No.3. P.495–505 [in Russian].
• Kulik I.L. 1951. [Rodents in haystacks] // [Issues of Regional, General, Experimental Parasitology, and Medical Zoology]. Moscow. No.7. P.284–316 [in Russian].
• Lissovsky A.A., Sheftel B.I., Saveljev A.P., Ermakov O.A., Kozlov Y.A., Smirnov D.G., Stakheev V.V. & Glazov D.M. 2019. [Mammals of Russia: Species List and Applied Issues]. Archives of Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Vol.56. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 191 p. [in Russian].
• Lissovsky A.A., Sheftel B.I., Stakheev V.V., Ermakov O.A., Smirnov D.G., Glazov D.M., Strelnikov D.P., Ekonomov A.V., Titov S.V., Obolenskaya E.V., Kozlov Y.A. & Saveljev A.P. 2018. Creating an integrated information system for the analysis of mammalian fauna in the Russian Federation and the preliminary results of this information system // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.17. No.2. P.85–90.
• Malygin V.M. & Deulin V.B. 1979. [Some features of Microtus arvalis species ecology and behavior] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.58. No.5. P.731–741 [in Russian].
• Malygin V.M. 1974. [Habitat distribution of sibling species of the common vole] // [Ekologiya]. Vol.5. No.1. P.89–91 [in Russian].
• Malygin V.M. 1983. [Systematics of Common Voles]. Moscow: Nauka. 206 p. [in Russian].
• Malygin V.M., Baskevich M.I. & Khlyap L.A. 2020. Invasions of the common vole sibling species // Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. Vol.11. P.47–65.
• Markova E.A., Starikov V.P., Yalkovskaya L.E., Zykov S.V., Morozkina A.V. & Sibiryakov P.A. 2014. Molecular and cytogenetic evidence for the occurrence of the East European vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) in the North of West Siberia // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.455. No.1. P.129–131.
• Meyer M.N. & Yatsenko V.N. 1980. [Taxonomic position and distribution of common and Kirghiz voles in southeastern Kazakhstan] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.59. No.2. P.283–288 [in Russian].
• Meyer M.N. 1968. [Complex taxonomic species analysis by example of some common voles forms (genus Microtus)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.47. No.6. P.850–859 [in Russian].
• Meyer M.N., Golenishchev F.N., Radzhabli S.I. & Sablina O.V. 1996. [The Grey Voles (Subgenus Microtus) of Russia and Adjacent Territories]. Saint Petersburg: Zoological Institute RAS. 320 p. [in Russian].
• Meyer M.N., Orlov V.N. & Skholl E.D. 1969. [Application of the data of karyological, physiological, and cytophysiological analyses for the determination of a new rodent species (Rodentia, Mammalia)] // Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, series of Biology. Vol.188. No.6. P.1411–1414 [in Russian].
• Meyer M.N., Orlov V.N. & Skholl E.D. 1972. [Sibling species in the group Microtus arvalis (Rodentia, Cricetidae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.51. No.5. P.724–738 [in Russian].
• Mikhailova T.V., Bernshtein A.D., Balakirev A.E., Apekina N.S., Al’bov S.A. & Novokhatka A.D. 2008. [Some features of Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis (Rodentia, Cricetidae) vole biology and their relationship with Tula hantavirus] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.87. No.2. P.239–247 [in Russian].
• Mokeeva T.M. & Chentsova N.Yu. 1981. [Some ecological and physiological features of the common vole sibling species — Microtus arvalis and M. subarvalis (Microtinae, Rodentia)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.60. No.5. P.752–763 [in Russian].
• Muscarella R., Galante P.J., Soley-Guardia M., Boria R.A., Kass J.M., Uriarte M. & Anderson R.P. 2014. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models // Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.5. No.11. P.1198–1205.
• Musser G.G. & Carleton M.D. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea // Wilson D.E. & Reeder D.M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Vol.2. P.894–1531.
• Neronov V.M., Khlyap L.A., Tupikova N.V. & Warshavsky A.A. 2001. Formation of rodent communities in arable lands of Northern Eurasia // Russian Journal of Ecology. Vol.32. No.5. P.326–333.
• Okulova N.M., Sapelnikov S.F., Baskevich M.I., Vlasova O.P., Mayorova A.D., Egorov S.V., Mironova T.A. & Sarychev V.P. 2008. [Comparative ecology of three forms of common voles Microtus arvalis sensu lato in the Central Chernozem region] // [Scientific Bulletin of the Belgorod State University. Ser. Natural Sciences]. No.3(43). P.128–139 [in Russian].
• Orlov V.N. 1969. [On the possible homology of karyotypes of 46- and 54-chromosomal common voles] // [Mammals (evolution, karyology, taxonomy, faunistics)]. Materials on II All-Union Meeting on Mammals. Novosibirsk. P.139–140 [in Russian].
• Phillips S.J. 2021. Package: maxnet, version 0.1.4. https://github.com/mrmaxent/maxnet
• Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Schapire R.E. & Blair M.E. 2017. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent // Ecography. Vol.40. No.7. P.887–893.
• Phillips S.J., Dudík M. & Schapire R.E. 2019. Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions (version 3.4.1). Available from: . Accessed 2 April 2019.
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
• Schoener T.W. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna // Ecology. Vol.49. P.704–726.
• Shchipanov N.A. & Pavlova S.V. 2019. Role of population structuring in the formation of karyotypic diversity of the common shrew Sorex araneus (Lipotyphla, Mammalia) // Russian Journal of Ecology. Vol.50. No.2. P.115–125.
• Shekhanov M.V. 1979. [Natural carriage of pathogens of human diseases by representatives of the lagomorphs (Lagomorpha) and rodents (Rodentia) orders of the fauna of the USSR] // Kucheruk V.V. (ed.). [Medical Theriology]. Moscow: Nauka. P.280–293 [in Russian].
• Shenbrot G.I. & Krasnov B.R. 2005. An Atlas of the Geographic Distribution of the Arvicoline Rodents of the World (Rodentia, Muridae: Arvicolinae). Sofia: Pensoft Publishers. 336 p.
• Sokolov V.E. & Bashenina N.V. (eds.). 1994. [Common Voles: Sibling Species Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779 and Microtus rossiaemeridionalis Ognev, 1928]. Moscow: Nauka. 459 p. [in Russian].
• Tikhonov I.A., Tikhonova G.N. & Osipova O.V. 2009a. Changes in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) and East European vole (Microtus rossiaemeridionalis) social behavior after combining conspecific groups // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.427. P.365–369.
• Tikhonov I.A., Tikhonova G.N. & Osipova O.V. 2009b. Influence of intra- and interspecific competition on daily activity of common (Microtus arvalis) and East European (Microtus rossiaemeridionalis) voles in experiments // Russian Journal of Ecology. Vol.40. No.1. P.55–60.
• Tikhonova G.N., Tikhonov I.A. & Osipova O.V. 2007. [Daily activity and intraspecific relations of common vole (Microtus arvalis) and Eastern European (M. rossiaemeridionalis) vole (Rodentia, Cricetidae) in experimental groups] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.86. No.3. P.360–368 [in Russian].
• Tikhonova G.N., Tikhonov I.A., Bogomolov P.L. & Polyakova L.V. 1999. On ecology of sibling species Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779 and Microtus rossiaemeridionalis Ognev, 1924 (Rodentia, Cricetidae) in Tsimlyansk sands // Biology Bulletin. Vol.26. No.3. P.247–255.
• Tikhonova G.N., Tikhonov I.A., Fedorovich E.Yu. & Davydova L.V. 2005. [Comparative analysis of exploratory behavior in sibling species Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis in relation to differences in their predisposition to synanthropy] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.84. No.5. P.618–627 [in Russian].
• Tikhonova G.N., Tikhonov I.A., Surov A.V., Bogomolov P.L. & Kotenkova E.V. 2012. [Ecological Aspects of the Formation of the Small Mammal Fauna of in the Urban Areas of Central Russia]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 371 p. [in Russian].
• Trankvilevsky D.V. & Kvasov D.A. 2018. [Number of small mammals in fields, stacks and ricks in the south of the central Black-earth Region] // Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology. No.4. P.465–484 [in Russian].
• Tupikova N.V., Khlyap L.A. & Warshavsky A.A. 2000. [Field rodents of northeastern Palaearctic] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.79. No.4. P.480–494 [in Russian].
• Vodă R., Dapporto L., Dincă V. & Vila R. 2015. Why do cryptic species tend not to co-occur? A case study on two cryptic pairs of butterflies // PLoS ONE. Vol.10. No.2. P.e0117802.
• Warren D.L., Glor R.E. & Turelli M. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models // Ecography. Vol.33. No.3. P.607–611.
• Waters J.M., Fraser C.I., Godfrey M. & Hewitt G.M. 2013. Founder takes all: density-dependent processes structure biodiversity // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.28. No.2. P.78–85.
• Zima J. 1999. Microtus arvalis // Mitchell-Jones A.J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W., Kryštufek B., Reijnders P.J.H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J.B.M., Vohralík V. & Zima J. (eds.). The Atlas of European Mammals. London: Academic Press. P.228–229.
• Zorenko T.A. 1980. [Comparative and ethological analysis of common vole sibling species] // [Proceedings of the 5th All-Union Meeting Rodents, Saratov]. Moscow: Nauka. P.19–20 [in Russian].

Download PDF