Reintroduction of the Siberian musk deer (Moschus moschiferus Linnaeus, 1758) in Central Mongolia: First practical experiences
Lkhagvasuren A., Baláž I., Samiya R., Amgalan B., Tulis F., Jagj G., Sainjargal M., Lkhagvasuren D.
P. 55-65
The Siberian musk deer (Moschus moschiferus Linnaeus, 1758), a small and elusive forest ungulate of northern Asia, has experienced significant population declines in Mongolia driven by habitat degradation, unsustainable pine nut harvesting, and intensive poaching. To support population recovery, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change of Mongolia, in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), implemented a conservation translocation program over three winter field seasons from 2020 to 2025. Fifteen individuals were captured in the Khan-undur Mountains, an area with stable musk deer occurrence, using coordinated drive-net techniques and transported approximately 130 km to the Bukhun Shar Mountains in the Khangai region.
At the release site, the animals were housed in semi-natural acclimatization enclosures designed to simulate natural forest habitat. Individuals received supplemental hay, lichens, and water and were monitored daily throughout winter to evaluate health, behavior, and adaptation prior to soft release in early spring. All capture, transport, and holding procedures were completed without mortality, demonstrating the feasibility, safety, and welfare compatibility of these methods under field conditions.
This initiative represents the first formally documented reintroduction of M. moschiferus in Central Mongolia. The experience gained provides practical guidance for future conservation translocations of small forest ungulates in continental climates. The integrated protocol drive-net capture, same-day short-distance transport, and soft release following prolonged acclimatization offers a realistic framework for similar efforts. Overall, the results underscore the importance of careful source-site selection, pre-release acclimatization, and structured post-release monitoring to improve long-term conservation outcomes for the Siberian musk deer.
DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.25.1.07References- Arnemo J. & Kreeger T. 2018. Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization. 5th edition. Wheatland: Kreeger Biologics. 312 p. DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21636
- Bannikov A.G. 1954. [Mammals of the Mongolian People’s Republic]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 669 p. [In Russian]
- Batsaikhan N., Buuveibaatar B., Chimed B., Enkhtuya O., Galbrakh D., Ganbaatar O., Lkhagvasuren B., Nandintsetseg D., Berger J., Calabrese J.M., et al. 2014. Conserving the world’s finest grassland amidst ambitious national development // Conservation Biology. Vol.28. No.6. P.1736–1739. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12297
- Baumgardt J.A., Foley A.M., Sliwa K.M., DeYoung R.W., Ortega-S. J.A., Hewitt D.G., Campbell T.A., Goolsby J.A. & Lohmeyer K.H. 2023. Effects of helicopter net gunning on the survival and movement behaviour of nilgai antelope // Wildlife Research. Vol.50. No.11. P.890–898. DOI: 10.1071/WR22049
- Bengsen A.J., Hampton J.O., Comte S., Freney S. & Forsyth D.M. 2021. Evaluation of helicopter net-gunning to capture wild fallow deer // Wildlife Research. Vol.48. No.8. P.722–729. DOI: 10.1071/WR21007
- Brichieri-Colombi T.A. & Moehrenschlager A. 2016. Alignment of threat, effort, and perceived success in North American conservation translocations // Conservation Biology. Vol.30. No.6. P.1159–1172. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12743
- Bubac C.M., Johnson A.C., Fox J.A. & Cullingham C.I. 2019. Conservation translocations and post-release monitoring: Identifying trends in failures, biases, and challenges from around the world // Biological Conservation. Vol.238. Art.e108239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108239
- Bukhun Shar Protected Area Administration. 2020. Management Plan of the Bukhun Shar Protected Area, Arkhangai Province, Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: Ministry of Environment and Tourism. 40 p.
- Cattet M.R.L. 2011. Capture, Handling and Release of Bears: Standard Operating Procedures. Version 2. Yellowknife: Wildlife Care Committee, Government of the Northwest Territories. 174 p.
- Clark E., Munkhbat J., Dulamtseren S., Baillie J., King S., Samiya R. & Stubbe M. 2006. Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Mammals. Ulaanbaatar. 70 p.
- Damdin J. 1989. [Status of musk deer populations in northern Mongolia] // Mongolian Journal of Ecology. Vol.2. No.1. P.45–50 [in Mongolian].
- Davaa N. 1963. [Distribution and ecology of Siberian musk deer in Mongolia] // Biology Journal of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. Vol.3. No.1. P.23–30 [in Mongolian].
- Davaa N. 1966. [Feeding habits of musk deer in the Khangai Mountains] // Proceedings of the Institute of Biology. Vol.8. No.2. P.65–72 [in Mongolian].
- Dulamsuren Ch., Hauck M. & Mühlenberg M. 2005. Vegetation at the taiga forest–steppe borderline in the western Khentey Mountains, northern Mongolia // Phytocoenologia. Vol.35. No.3–4. P.177–194.
- Dulamtseren S. 1977. The Ecology and Importance of Game Species of Khangai and Khentii Mountainous Regions. PhD Thesis. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian State University. 150 p. [In Mongolian]
- Dulamtseren S. 1989. [Mammal Distribution and Numbers in Forest-steppe Zones]. Ulaanbaatar: Institute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences. 75 p. [In Mongolian]
- Fischer J. & Lindenmayer D.B. 2000. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations // Biological Conservation. Vol.96. No.1. P.1–11. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00048-3
- Green M.J.B. 1987. Diet composition and quality in Himalayan musk deer based on fecal analysis // Journal of Wildlife Management. Vol.51. No.4. P.880–887. DOI: 10.2307/3801755
- Hayward M.W. & Somers M.J. 2009. Reintroduction of top-order predators: Using science to restore one of the drivers of biodiversity // In: Reintroduction of Top-Order Predators. John Wiley & Sons. P.1–9. DOI: 10.1002/9781444312034.ch1
- IUCN. 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Moschus moschiferus. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org
- Kirkwood J. 2013. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations // Animal Welfare. Vol.22. No.4. P.489–490. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600005637
- Kreeger T.J. & Arnemo J.M. 2018. Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization. 5th edition. Wheatland: Kreeger Biologics. 312 p.
- Letty J., Marchandeau S. & Aubineau J. 2007. Problems encountered by individuals in animal translocations: Lessons from field studies // Ecoscience. Vol.14. No.4. P.420–431. DOI: 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[420:PEBIIA]2.0.CO;2
- Maksimova D., Seryodkin I., Zaitsev V. & Miquelle D. 2014. Research program of musk deer ecology in the Sikhote-Alin region // Achievements in the Life Sciences. Vol.8. P.65–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.als.2014.11.005
- Namnandorj O. 1957. [Geographical Distribution of Mammals in Mongolia]. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian State Publishing. 280 p. [In Mongolian]
- Prihodko V.I. 2018. Dynamics of the musk deer (Moschus moschiferus L.) population in Russia // The Herald of Game Management. Vol.15. No.1. P.26–32.
- Prihodko V.I. 2019. Restoration of musk deer numbers in Russia: Breeding in captivity or protection of wild populations? // The Herald of Game Management. Vol.16. No.1. P.72–80.
- Prihodko V.I. 2021. [Musk Deer: Resources and Conservation Status in Russia]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 312 p. [In Russian]
- Quicksilver Air Inc. 2005. Animal Handling & Safety Manual. Colorado: Colorado State University / National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 96 p.
- Schemnitz S., Batcheller G., Lovallo M., White H. & Fall M. 2009. Capturing and Handling Wild Animals. USDA Wildlife Services. 240 p.
- Seddon P.J., Armstrong D.P. & Maloney R.F. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology // Conservation Biology. Vol.21. No.2. P.303–312.
- Seddon P.J., Strauss W.M. & Innes J. 2012. Animal translocations: what are they and why do we do them? // In: Ewen J.G., Armstrong D.P., Parker K.A. & Seddon P.J. (eds.). Reintroduction Biology: Integrating Science and Management. John Wiley & Sons. P.1–32.
- Shagdarsuren O. 1969. [Ecological Studies on Hunting Mammals in Mongolia]. Ulaanbaatar: Science and Technology Press. 360 p. [In Mongolian]
- Shagdarsuren O. 1974. [Conservation Strategies for Forest and Taiga Mammals]. Ulaanbaatar: Academy of Sciences. 420 p. [In Mongolian]
- Smedley R., McMillan B.R., Hersey K.R., Shannon J.M. & Larsen R.T. 2023. Outcomes associated with translocation of mule deer // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.11. Art.e1087058. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1087058
- Taylor W.P., Reynolds H.V. & Ballard W.B. 2005. Wildlife Capture and Chemical Restraint Manual. Fairbanks: Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 91 p.
- Thévenin C. 2019. Reintroduction efficiency: a steppingstone approach to reintroduction success? // Animal Conservation. Vol.22. No.2. P.116–117. DOI: 10.1111/acv.12501
- Thévenin C., Morin A., Kerbiriou C., Sarrazin F. & Robert A. 2020. Heterogeneity in the allocation of reintroduction efforts among terrestrial mammals in Europe // Biological Conservation. Vol.241. Art.e108346. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108346
- Tsendjav D. 2000. [Assessment of the Siberian musk deer population in Mongolia]. Wildlife Conservation Report. Ulaanbaatar: Institute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences. Report 12 [in Mongolian].
- Tsendjav D. 2008. [Population status and habitat threats of Moschus moschiferus]. Ecology and Conservation Bulletin. Vol.4. No.2. P.9–15 [in Mongolian].
- Yi L., Dalai M., Su R., Lin W., Erdenedalai M., Luvsantseren B., Chimedtseren C., Wang Z. & Hasi S. 2020. Whole-genome sequencing of wild Siberian musk deer provides insights into its genetic features // BMC Genomics. Vol.21. Art.e108. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6495-2
- Zhang C., Fan Y., Chen M., Xia W., Wang J., Zhan Z., Wang W., Khan T.U., Wu S. & Luan X. 2022. Identification of conservation priority areas and a protection network for the Siberian musk deer in Northeast China // Animals. Vol.12. No.3. Art.e260. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030260
Download PDF
|
