References

• Altendorf K.B., Laundre J.W., Lopez Gonzalez C.A. & Brown J.S. 2001. Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.82. No.2. P.430–439.
• Barton K. 2015. MuMIn: multi-model Inference // R package version 1.15.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
• Benhaiem S., Delon M., Lourtet B., Cargnelutti B., Aulagnier S., Hewison A.J.M., Morellet N. & Verheyden H. 2008. Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection // Animal Behaviour. Vol.76. No.3. P.611–618.
• Benoist S., Garel M., Cugnasse J.-M. & Blanchard P. 2013. Human disturbances, habitat characteristics and social environment generate sex-specific responses in vigilance of Mediterranean mouflon // PLoS ONE. Vol.8. No.12. e82960.
• Bongi P., Ciuti S., Grignolio S., Del Frate M., Gandelli D. & Apollonio M. 2008. Anti-predator behaviour, space use and habitat selection in female roe deer during the fawning season in a wolf area // Journal of Zoology. Vol.276. No.3. P.242–251.
• Bonnot N., Verheyden H., Blanchard P., Cote J., Debeffe L., Cargnelutti B., Klein F., Hewison A.J.M. & Morellet N. 2015. Interindividual variability in habitat use: evidence for a risk management syndrome in roe deer? // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.26. No.1. P.105–114.
• Borkowski J. 2001. Flight behaviour and observability in human-disturbed sika deer // Acta Theriologica. Vol.46. No.2. P.195–206.
• Brooks M.E., Kristensen K., van Benthem K.J., Magnusson A., Berg C.W., Nielsen A., Skaug H.J., Maechler M. & Bolker B.M. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling // R Journal. Vol.9. No.2. P.378–400.
• Burnham K.P. & Anderson D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 488 p.
• Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. & Huyvaert K.P. 2011. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.65. P.23–35.
• Ciuti S., Northrup J.M., Muhly T.B., Simi S., Musiani M., Pit J.A. & Boyce M.S. 2012. Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear // PLoS ONE. Vol.7. No.11. e50611.
• Creel S. 2018. The control of risk hypothesis: reactive vs. proactive antipredator responses and stress-mediated vs. food-mediated costs of response // Ecology Letters. Vol.21. No.7. P.947–956.
• Creel S., Christianson D., Liley S. & Winnie J.A. 2007. Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk // Science. Vol.315. No.5814. P.960.
• Cromsigt J.P.G.M., Kujiper D.P.J., Adam M., Beschta R.L., Churski M., Eycott A., Kerley G.I.H., Mysterud A., Schmidt K. & West K. 2013. Hunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts // Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol.50. No.3. P.544–549.
• Doormaal N. van, Ohashi H., Koike S. & Kaji K. 2015. Influence of human activities on the activity patterns of Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Central Japan // European Journal of Wildlife Research. Vol.61. P.517–527.
• Eccard J.A., Meißner J.K. & Heurich M. 2017. European roe deer increase vigilance when faced with immediate predation risk by Eurasian lynx // Ethology. Vol.123. No.1. P.30–40.
• Ikeda T., Takahashi H., Igota H., Matsuura Y., Azumaya M., Yoshida T. & Kaji K. 2019. Effects of culling intensity on diel and seasonal activity patterns of sika deer (Cervus nippon) // Scientific Reports. Vol.9. P.17205.
• Jayakody S., Sibbald A.M., Gordon I.J. & Lambin X. 2008. Red deer Cervus elaphus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance // Wildlife Biology. Vol.14. No.1. P.81–91.
• Jarnemo A. & Wikenros C. 2014. Movement pattern of red deer during drive hunts in Sweden // European Journal of Wildlife Research. Vol.60. No.1. P.77–84.
• Kaji K., Saitoh T., Uno H., Matsuda H. & Yamamura K. 2010. Adaptive management of sika deer populations in Hokkaido, Japan: Theory and practice // Population Ecology. Vol.52. P.373–387.
• Kamei T., Takeda K., Izumiyama S. & Ohshima K. 2010. The effect of hunting on the behavior and habitat utilization of sika deer (Cervus nippon) // Mammal Study. Vol.35. No.4. P.235–241.
• Kuijper D.P.J., Bubnicki J.W., Churski M., Mols B. & van Hooft P. 2015. Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.26. No.6. P.1558–1568.
• Lima S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator–prey interactions // Bioscience. Vol.48. No.1. P.25–34.
• Lima S.L. & Bednekoff P.A. 1999. Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis // American Naturalist. Vol.153. No.6. P.649–659.
• Lung M.A. & Childress M.J. 2007. The influence of conspecific and predation risk on the vigilance of elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.18. No.1. P.12–20.
• Nagata J. 2015. Cervus nippon Temminck, 1836 // Ohdachi S.D., Ishibashi Y., Iwasa M.A., Fukui D. & Saitoh T. (eds.) The Wild Mammals of Japan. 2nd ed. Kyoto: Shoukadoh. P.304–306.
• Pecorella I., Ferreti F., Sforzi A. & Macchi E. 2016. Effects of culling on vigilance behaviour and endogenous stress response of female fallow deer // Wildlife Research Vol.43. No.3. P.189–196.
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing // Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed 25 January 2017).
• Ripple W.J., Estes J.A., Beschta R.L., Wilmers C.C., Ritchie E.G., Hebblewhite M., Berger J., Elmhagen B., Letnic M., Nelson M.P., Schmitz O.J., Smith D.W., Wallach A.D. & Wirsing A.J. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the world
• Sakio H., Kubo M., Kawanishi M. & Higa M. 2013. Effects of deer feeding on forest floor vegetation in the Chichibu Mountains, Japan // Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. Vol.39. No.2. P.226–231.
• Sakurai R. 2019. Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in Japan: From Asia to the World. Singapore: Springer. 139 p.
• Schuttler S.G., Parsons A.W., Forrester T.D., Baker M.C., McShea W.J., Costello R. & Kays R. 2017. Deer on the lookout: how hunting, hiking and coyotes affect white-tailed deer vigilance // Journal of Zoology. Vol.301. No.4. P.320–327.
• Takatsuki S. 2009. Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: a review // Biological Conservation. Vol.142. No.9. P.1922–1929.
• Tsunoda H. & Enari H. 2020. A strategy of wildlife management in the depopulating rural society of Japan // Conservation Biology. Vol.34. No.4. P.819–828.
• Winnie J.J. & Creel S. 2007. Sex-specific behavioural responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the threat of wolf predation // Animal Behaviour. Vol.73. No.1. P.215–225.
• Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N. & Elphick C.S. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems // Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.1. No.1. P.3–14.

Download PDF