Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page
Free access to the published articles
Information about online submission, Articles format, Instructions for authors etc
Instructions for reviewers
Subscription and prices
Contacts

Русскоязычный вариант сайта
Can skull morphology-morphometry discern Russian wolf-dog hybrids from wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris)?
Korablev P.N., Korablev N.P., Zinoviev A.V., Korablev M.P.
P. 62-73
Although wolves, dogs and their hybrids can be discerned by genetic analysis, the study of morphology-morphometry to discern the three groups remains important as genetic analysis is not always possible or too expensive. In this study we aim to differentiate the three subgroups by analyzing two morphometric and ten morphological characteristics in 329 canid skulls. After morphometric-morphologic allocation, we applied genetic analysis on 108 skulls based on 11 autosomal microsatellites to verify the morphometric-morphologic results. In 30 specimens genetic tests were unsuccessful. In addition, 23 samples from wolves (14 skins and 9 muscle samples) as well as 32 samples from modern dogs (8 hair and 24 blood samples) were used as reference data in the genetic analysis. Based on morphology-morphometry we diagnosed 322 wolves, four dogs and three hybrids. Genetic testing was done on 78 specimens: one presumed dog, three presumed hybrids and 74 of the wolves, as diagnosed morphologically before. All, but one, morphologically diagnosed wolves, were confirmed as being wolves genetically. That one was identified a hybrid genetically. From the four morphological dogs one was confirmed genetically, the other three had failed genetic tests. Of the three morphological hybrids one was genetically a dog. The results of this study indicate the absence of reliable morphological criteria for identifying skulls of hybrids, which is a consequence of the high morphological variability in dogs and wolves. However, the use of morphometric and morphological characteristics, helps to narrow the numbers of skulls that require genetic analysis for more precise identification.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.22.1.07

References

  • Aaris-Sørensen K. 1977. The subfossil wolf, Canis lupus L. in Denmark // Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisch Forensen. Vol.29. P.129–146.

  • Barabash-Nikiforov N. 1957. [Animals of the Southeastern Part of the Chernozemnyi Tsentr]. Voronezh: Knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 370 p. [in Russian].

  • Benecke N. 1987. Studies on early dog remains from Northern Europe // Journal of Archaeological Sciences. Vol.14. P.31–49.

  • Bibikov D. (ed.). 1985. [The Wolf. History, Systematics, Morphology, Ecology]. Moscow: Nauka. 606 p. [in Russian].

  • Bockelmann H. 1920. Untersuchungen an Wolfsbastarden nach Ziichtungsversuchen im Haustiergarten zu Halle. Doctoral Dissertation. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität-Halle-Wittenberg.

  • Boitani L. 2000. Action plan for the conservation of the wolves (Canis lupus) in Europe // Nature and Environment. Council of Europe Publishing. Vol.11. P.31–86.

  • Caniglia R., Galaverni M., Velli E., Mattucci F., Canu A., Apollonio M., Mucci N., Scandura M. & Fabbri E. 2020. A standardized approach to empirically define reliable assignment thresholds and appropriate management categories in deeply introgressed populations // Scientific Reports. Vol.10. P.e2862.

  • Donfrancesco V., Ciucci P., Salvatori V., Benson D., Andersen L., Bassi E., Blanco J., Boitani L., Caniglia R., Canu A., Capitani C., Chapron G., Czarnomska S., Fabbri E., Galaverni M., Galov A., Gimenez O., Godinho R., Greco C., Hindrikson M., Huber D., Hulva P., Jędrzejewski W., Kusak J., Linnell J., Llaneza L., López-Bao J., Männil P., Marucco F., Mattioli L., Milanesi P., Milleret C., Mysłajek R., Ordiz A., Palacios V., Pedersen H., Pertoldi C., Pilot M., Randi E., Rodríguez A., Saarma U., Sand H., Scandura M., Stronen A., Tsingaraska E. & Mukherjee N. 2019. Unravelling the scientific debate on how to address wolf-dog hybridization in Europe // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.7. P.e175.

  • Dufresnes C., Miquel C., Taberlet P. & Fumagalli L. 2019. Last but not beast: the fall of the Alpine wolves told by historical DNA // Mammal Research. Vol.64. P.595–600.

  • Francisco L., Langston A., Mellersh C., Neal C. & Ostrander E. 1996. A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping // Mammalian Genome. Vol.7. P.359–362.

  • Fredholm M. & Wintero A. 1995. Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to the Canidae family // Mammalian Genome. Vol.6. P.11–18.

  • Germonpré M., Láznicková-Galetová M. & Sablin M. 2012. Palaeolithic dog skulls at the Gravettian Predmostí site, the Czech Republic // Journal of Archaeological Science. Vol.39. P.184–202.

  • Gipson P., Ballard W., Nowak R. & Mechlo L. 2000. Accuracy and precision of estimating age of gray wolves by tooth wear // Journal of Wildlife Management. Vol.64. No.3. P.752–758.

  • Godinho R., Llaneza L., Blanco J., Lopes S., Alvares F., Garcıa E., Palacios V., Cortes Y., Talegon J. & Ferrand N. 2011. Genetic evidence for multiple events of hybridization between wolves and domestic dogs in the Iberian Peninsula // Molecular Ecology. Vol.20. P.5154–5166.

  • Hindrikson M., Mannil P., Ozolins J., Krzywinski A. & Saarma U. 2012. Bucking the trend in wolf-dog hybridization: first evidence from Europe of hybridization between female dogs and male wolves // PLoS ONE. Vol.7. P.e46465.

  • Iljin N. 1941. Wolf-dog genetics // Journal of Genetics. Vol.42. P.359–414.

  • Janssens L., Perri A., Crombe P., Van Dongen S. & Lawler D. 2019. An evaluation of classical morphologic and morphometric parameters reported to distinguish wolves and dogs // Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. Vol.23. P.501–533.

  • Khosravi R., Rezaei H. & Kaboli M. 2013. Detecting hybridization between Iranian wild wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) and free-ranging domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by analysis of microsatellite markers // Zoological Science. Vol.30. No.1. P.27–34.

  • Klevezal G. 2007. [Principles and Methods for Determining the Age of Mammals]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 283 p. [in Russian].

  • Kopaliani N., Shakarashvili M., Gurielidze Z., Qurkhuli T. & Tarkhnishvili D. 2014. Gene flow between wolf and shepherd dog populations in Georgia (Caucasus) // Journal of Heredity. Vol.105. No.3. P.345–353.

  • Korablev M., Korablev N. & Korablev P. 2021a. Genetic diversity and population structure of the grey wolf (Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758) and evidence of wolf × dog hybridisation in the centre of European Russia // Mammalian Biology. Vol.101. No.1. P.91–104.

  • Korablev N., Korablev P., Korablev M., Korablev A., Sedova N. & Zinoviev A. 2021b. [Craniometric variability of Canis lupus, Carnivora, Canidae in the centre of European Russia] // Nature Conservation Research. Vol.6. No.1. P.50–67 [in Russian with English summary].

  • Landon D., Waite C., Peterson R. & Mech L. 1998. Evaluation of age determination techniques for gray wolves // Journal of Wildlife Management. Vol.62. No.2. P.674–682.

  • Lawrence B. & Reed C. 1983. The dogs of Jarmo // Braidwood L.S., Braidwood R.J., Howe B., Reed C.A. & Watson P.J. (eds.). Prehistoric Archeology Along the Zagros Flanks. Chicago: University of Chicago, Oriental Institute. P.485–489.

  • Mech L. & Boitani L. (eds.). 2003. Wolves. Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 448 p.

  • Mech L., Nowak R. & Weisberg S. 2011. Use of cranial characters in taxonomy of the Minnesota wolf (Canis sp.) // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.89. P.1188–1194.

  • Milenković M., Habijan-Mikeš V. & Matić R. 2006. Cases of spontaneous interbreeding of wolf and domestic dog in the region of Southeast Banat (Serbia) // The Archives of Biological Sciences. Vol.58. No.4. P.225–231.

  • Nielsen E., Bach L. & Kotlicki P. 2006. HYBRIDLAB (version 1.0): a program for generating simulated hybrids from population samples // Molecular Ecology Notes. Vol.6. P.971–973.

  • Olsen S. & Olsen J. 1977. The Chinese wolf, ancestor of New World dogs // Science. Vol.197. P.533–535.

  • Ostrander E., Sprague G. & Rine J. 1993. Identification and characterization of dinucleotide repeat (CA) n markers for genetic mapping in dog // Genomics. Vol.16. P.207–213.

  • Pacheco C., López-Bao J., García E., Lema F., Llaneza L., Palacios V. & Godinho R. 2017. Spatial assessment of wolf-dog hybridization in a single breeding period // Scientific Reports. Vol.7. P.e42475.

  • Pritchard J., Stephens M. & Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data // Genetics. Vol.155. P.945–959.

  • Pilot M., Greco C., vonHoldt B., Randi E., Jędrzejewski W., Sidorovich V., Konopiński M., Ostrander E. & Wayne R. 2018. Widespread, long-term admixture between grey wolves and domestic dogs across Eurasia and its implications for the conservation status of hybrids // Evolutionary Applications. Vol.11. P.662–680.

  • Pilot M., Moura A., Okhlopkov I., Mamaev N., Manaseryan N., Hayrapetyan V., Kopaliani N., Tsingarska E., Alagaili A., Mohammed O., Ostrander E. & Bogdanowicz W. 2021. Human-modified canids in human-modified landscapes: The evolutionary consequences of hybridization for grey wolves and free-ranging domestic dogs // Evolutionary Applications. Vol.14. P.2433–2456.

  • Randi E., Hulva P., Fabbri E., Galaverni M., Galov A., Kusak J., Bigi D., Černá Bolfíková B., Smetanová M. & Caniglia R. 2014. Multilocus detection of wolf x dog hybridization in Italy, and guidelines for marker selection // PLoS ONE. Vol.9. No.3. P.e91412.

  • Randi E., Lucchini V., Christensen M., Mucci N., Funk S. & Doolf G. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Italian and East European wolves: detecting the consequences of small population size and hybridization // Conservation Biology. Vol.14. P.464–473.

  • Ryabov L. 1973. [Wolf-dog hybrids in the Voronezh Region] // Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series. Vol.78. No.6. P.25–38 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Ryabov L. 1978. [New data on wolves and their hybrids with dogs in the Voronezh region] // Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series. Vol.83. No.3. P.39–45 [in Russian, with English summary].

  • Ryabov L. 1985. [The consequences of violation of the structure of the wolf population] // [The Wolf. History, Systematics, Morphology, Ecology]. Moscow: Nauka. P.432–446 [in Russian].

  • Ryabov L. & Bibikov D. 1982. [Is the ecological niche of the wolf empty?] // Priroda. No.3. P.26–30 [in Russian].

  • Salvatori V., Godinho R., Braschi C., Boitani L. & Ciucci P. 2019. High levels of recent wolf × dog introgressive hybridization in agricultural landscapes of central Italy // European Journal of Wildlife Research. Vol.65. P.e73.

  • Stubbe M. 1981. The wolf, Canis lupus L. // Stubbe H. (ed.). Buch der Hege, Band 1. Haarwild. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag. P.269–285.

  • Studer T. 1901. [Die prähistorischen Hunde in ihrer Beziehung zu den gegenwärtig lebenden Rassen] // Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen paläontologischen Gesellschaft. Vol.28. Zurich: Zurcher und Furrer. P.1–137.

  • Verardi A., Lucchini V. & Randi E. 2006. Detecting introgressive hybridisation between free-ranging domestic dogs and wild wolves (Canis lupus) by admixture linkage disequilibrium analysis // Molecular Ecology. Vol.15. P.2845–2855.

  • Vilà C. & Wayne R. 1999. Hybridization between wolves and dogs // Conservation Biology. Vol.13. P.195–198.

  • Vilà C., Walker C., Sundqvist A., Flagstad O., Andersone Z., Casulli A., Kojola I., Valdmann H., Halverson J. & Ellegren H. 2003. Combined use of maternal, paternal and bi-parental genetic markers for the identification of wolf-dog hybrids // Heredity. Vol.90. P.17–24.

  • Yudin V. 1992. [Wolf of the Russian Far East]. Blagoveshchensk: Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Science. 311 p. [in Russian].

  • Yudin V. 2013. [Wolf of the Russian Far East]. Second edition, revised. Vladivostok: Dalnauka. 412 p. [in Russian].

  • Zeuner F. 1963. The Dog. New York: Harper and Row. 560 p.

Download PDF