References

• Alberdi M.T., Arroyo-Cabrales J., Marín-Leyva A.H. & Polaco O.J. 2014. Study of Cedral horses and their place in the Mexican Quaternary // Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas. Vol.31. No.2. P.221–237.
• Azzaroli A. 1989. The genus Equus in Europe // Lindsay E.H., Fahlbusch V. & Mein P. (eds.). European Neogene mammal chronology. New York: Plenum Press. P.339–356.
• Barrón-Ortiz C.I., Rodrigues A.T., Theodor J.M., Kooyman B.P., Yang D.Y. & Speller C.F. 2017. Cheek tooth morphology and ancient mitochondrial DNA of late Pleistocene horses from the western interior of North America: Implications for the taxonomy of North American Late Pleistocene Equus // PLoS ONE. Vol.12. No.8. e0183045.
• Berg R.L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades // Evolution. Vol.14. No.1. P.171–180.
• Berkovitz B.K.B. & Shellis R.P. 2018. The teeth of mammalian vertebrates. London: Academic Press. 346 p.
• Bernor R.L., Cirilli O., Jukar A.M., Potts R., Buskianidze M. & Rook L. 2019. Evolution of early Equus in Italy, Georgia, the Indian subcontinent, East Africa, and the origins of African zebras // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.7. P.166.
• Bolker J.A. 2000. Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo // American Zoologist. Vol.40. No.5. P.770–776.
• Bonnet E. & de Peer Y. 2002. Zt: A software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests // Journal of Statistical Softwear. Vol.7. No.10. P.1–12.
• Bookstein F.L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 435 p.
• Bookstein F.L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape // Medical Image Analysis. Vol.1. No.3. P.225–243.
• Boulbes N. & van Asperen E.N. 2019. Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of European Equus // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Vol.7. P.301.
• Bravo-Cuevas V.M., Jiménez-Hidalgo E. & Priego-Vargas J. 2011. Taxonomía y hábito alimentario de Equus conversidens (Perissodactyla, Equidae) del Pleistoceno Tardío (Rancholabreano) de Hidalgo, centro de México // Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas. Vol.28. No.1. P.65–82.
• Callebaut W. & Rasskin-Gutman D. 2005. Modularity. Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. 472 p.
• Cardini A. 2003. The geometry of the marmot (Rodentia: Sciuridae) mandible: Phylogeny and patterns of morphological evolution // Systematic Biology. Vol.52. No.2. P.186–205.
• Cheverud J.M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium // Evolution. Vol.36. No.3. P.499–516.
• Cheverud J.M. 1995. Morphological integration in the Saddle-Back Tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium // The American Naturalist. Vol.145. No.1. P.63–89.
• Cheverud J.M., Wagner G.P. & Dow M.M. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns // Systematic Zoology. Vol.38. No.3. P.201–213.
• Chuang R. & Bonhomme V. 2019. Rethinking the dental morphological differences between domestic equids // Journal of Archaeological Sciences. Vol.101. No.1. P.140–148.
• Churcher C.S. 1993. Equus grevyi // Mammalian Species. No.453. P.1–9.
• Cochard L.R. 1981. Patterns of size variation and correlation in the dentition of the red colobus monkey (Colobus badius) // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Vol.54. No.1. P.139–146.
• Cucchi T., Mohaseb A., Peigné S., Debue K., Orlando L. & Mashkour M. 2017. Detecting taxonomic and phylogenetic signals in equid cheek teeth: Towards new palaeontological and archaeological proxies // Royal Society Open Science. No.4. 160997.
• Dalquest W.W. & Dame J.T.H. 1965. The Pleistocene horse, Equus conversidens // American Midland Naturalist. Vol.74. No.2. P.408–417.
• Dayan T., Wool D. & Simberloff D. 2002. Variation and covariation of skulls and teeth: Modern carnivores and the interpretation of fossil mammals // Paleobiology. Vol.28. No.4. P.508–526.
• Dyurst U. 1936. [Exterior of the horse]. Moscow-Leningrad: Selkhozgiz. 344 p. [in Russian].
• Eisenmann V. 2020. Equidés monodactyles fossiles (Equus, Allohippus, Plesippus, Hippidion). https://vera-eisenmann.com/-equides-monodactyles-fossiles-equus-allohippus-plesippus-?lang=en
• Ferson S.F., Rohlf F.J. & Koehn R.K. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines // Systematic Zoology. Vol.34. No.1. P.59–68.
• Foronova I.V. 2002. Late quaternary equids (genus Equus) of South-western and South-central Siberia // Mashkour M. (ed.). Equids in time and space: Papers in honour of Véra Eisenmann. Oxford: Oxbow Books. P.20–30.
• Gidley J.W. 1901. Tooth characters and revision of the North American species of the genus Equus // Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol.14. P.91–142.
• Gingerich P.D. & Winkler D.A. 1979. Patterns of variation and correlation in the dentition of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.60. No.4. P.691–704.
• Gómez-Robles A. & Polly P.D. 2012. Morphological integration in the hominin dentition: evolutionary, developmental, and functional factors // Evolution. Vol.66. No.4. P.1024–1043.
• Goswami A. 2006. Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull // Evolution. Vol.60. No.1. P.169–183.
• Goswami A. & Polly P.D. 2010. Methods for studying morphological integration and modularity // The Paleontological Society Papers. Vol.16. P.213–243.
• Gould S.J. & Garwood R.A. 1969. Levels of integration in mammalian dentitions: An analysis of correlations in Nesophontes micrus (Insectivora) and Oryzomys couesi (Rodentia) // Evolution. Vol.23. No.3. P.276–300.
• Hall B.K. 1995. Homology and embryonic development // Hecht M.K., Macintyre R.J. & Clegg M.T. (eds.). Evolutionary Biology. Boston: Springer. P.1–36.
• Hallgrímsson B., Jamniczky H., Young N.M., Rolian C., Parsons T.E., Boughner J.C. & Marcucio R.S. 2009. Deciphering the palimpsest: Studying the relationship between morphological integration and phenotypic covariation // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.36. No.4. P.355–376.
• Hammer Ø., Harper D. & Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST. PAleontological STatistics software package for education and data analysis // Palaeontologia Electronica. Vol.4. No.1. P.1–9.
• Hay O.P. 1915. Contributions to the knowledge of the mammals of the Pleistocene of North America // Proceedings of the United States National Museum. Vol.48. No.2086. P.515–575.
• Heck L., Wilson L.A.B., Evin A., Stange M. & Sánchez-Villagra M.R. 2018. Shape variation and modularity of skull and teeth in domesticated horses and wild equids // Frontiers in Zoology. Vol.15. P.14.
• Hibbard C.W. 1953. Equus (Asinus) calobatus Troxell and associated vertebrates from the Pleistocene of Kansas // Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. Vol.56. No.1. P.111–126.
• Hulbert R.C. 1995. Equus from Leisey Shell Pit La and other Irvingtonian localities from Florida // Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History. Vol.37. No.17. P.553–602.
• Jernvall J. 1995. Mammalian molar cusp patterns: Developmental mechanisms of diversity // Acta Zoologica Fennica. Vol.198. P.1–61.
• Jernvall J. 2000. Linking development with generation of novelty in mammalian teeth // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol.97. P.2641–2645.
• Jernvall J., Hunter J.P. & Fortelius M. 2000. Trends in the evolution of molar crown types in ungulate mammals: evidence from the Northern Hemisphere // Teaford M.F., Smith M.M. & Ferguson M.W.J. (eds.). Development, function and evolution of teeth. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. P.269–281.
• Klingenberg C.P. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules and evolvability // Hallgrimsson B. & Hall B.K. (eds.). Variation: A central concept of biology. Oxford: Academic Press. P. 219–247.
• Klingenberg C.P. 2008a. Morphological integration and developmental modularity // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Vol.39. P.115–132.
• Klingenberg C.P. 2008b. Novelty and “homology-free” morphometrics: What’s in a name? // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.35. No.1. P.186–190.
• Klingenberg C.P. 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: Tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses // Evolution & Development. Vol.11. No.4. P.405–421.
• Klingenberg C.P. 2014. Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: Concepts and analysis // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol.369. No.1649. 20130249.
• Kuhl F.P. & Giardina C.R. 1982. Elliptic Fourier analysis of a closed contour // Computer Graphics and Image Processing. Vol.18. No.3. P.236–258.
• Kurtén B. 1953. On the variation and population dynamics of fossil and recent mammal populations // Acta Zoologica Fennica Vol.76. P.1–122.
• Kurtén B., 1968. Pleistocene mammals of Europe. Chicago: Aldine. 217 p.
• Labonne G., Navarro N., Laffont R., Chateau-Smith C. & Montuire S. 2014. Developmental integration in a functional unit: Deciphering processes from adult dental morphology // Evolution & Development. Vol.16. No.4. P.224–232.
• Laffont R., Renvoise E., Navarro N., Alibert P. & Montuirea S. 2009. Morphological modularity and assessment of developmental processes within the vole dental row (Microtus arvalis, Arvicolinae, Rodentia) // Evolution & Development. Vol.11. No.3. P.302–311.
• Laubichler M.D. & Maienschein J. 2008. Evolving pathways: Key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 446 p.
• Ledevin R., Quéré J.-P. & Renaud S. 2010. Morphometrics as an insight into processes beyond tooth shape variation in a bank vole population // PLoS ONE. Vol.5. No.11. e15470.
• Lyakh A.M. 2019. Analysis of biological shapes on the basis of coordinated coefficients of elliptic Fourier transformation // Science in the South of Russia. Vol.15. No.4. P.63–70
• MacFadden B.J. 1993. Fossil horses: Systematics, paleobiology, and evolution of the family Equidae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK). 384 p.
• MacFadden B.J. 2013 Dispersal of Pleistocene Equus (family Equidae) into South America and calibration of GABI 3 based on evidence from Tarija, Bolivia // PLoS ONE. Vol.8. No.3. e59277.
• Magwene P.M. 2008. Using correlation proximity graphs to study phenotypic integration // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.35. No.3. P.191–198.
• Mitteroecker P. 2009. The developmental basis of variational modularity: Insights from quantitative genetics, morphometrics, and developmental biology // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.36. No.4. P.377–385.
• Mitteroecker P. & Gunz P. 2009. Advances in geometric morphometrics // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.36. No.4. P.235–247.
• Monteiro L.R., Bonato V. & dos Reis S.F. 2005. Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: Mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae) // Evolution & Development. Vol.7. No.5. P.429–439.
• Murren C.J. 2002. Phenotypic integration in plants // Plant Species Biology. Vol.17. No.2–3. P.89–99.
• Navarro N., Zararain X. & Montuire S. 2004. Effects of morphometric descriptor change on statistical classification and morphospaces // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.83. No.2. P.243–260.
• Olson E.C. & Miller R.L. 1958. Morphological integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 376 p.
• Parner E.T., Heidmann J.M., Kjær I., Væth M. & Poulsen S. 2002. Biological interpretation of the correlation of emergence times of permanent teeth // Journal of Dental Research. Vol.81. No.7. P.451–454.
• Pavlicev M.C., James M. & Wagner G.P. 2009. Measuring morphological integration using eigenvalue variance // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.36. No.4. P.157–170.
• Pavlinov I.Ya. 2011. Morphological disparity: An attempt to widen and to formalize the concept // Pavlinov I.Ya. (ed.). Research in biodiversity: Models and applications. Rejeka: InTech Open. P.341–364.
• Pavlinov I.Ya. & Mikeshina N.G. 2002. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics] // Journal of General Biology. Vol.63. No.6. P.473–493. [in Russian, with English summary]
• Pavlinov I.Ya., Nanova O.G. & Lissovsky A.A. 2008a. [Correlation analysis of the structure of the cheek toothrow in the Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus, Canidae)] // Zoological Journal. Vol.87. No.7. P.862–875. [in Russian, with English summary]
• Pavlinov I.Ya., Nanova O.G. & Spasskaya N.N. 2008b. [To exploration of the morphological disparity of the measurable traits of the mammalian skull. 1. On the relation of different forms of the group variation] // Journal of General Biology. Vol.69. No.5. P.453–459. [in Russian, with English summary]
• Pengilly D. 1984. Developmental versus functional explanations for patterns of variability and correlation in the dentitions of foxes // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.65. No.1. P.34–43.
• Prothero D.R. & Foss S.E. 2007. The evolution of artiodactyls. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. 384 p.
• Renaud S., Pantalacci S., Quéré J.-P., Laudet V. & Auffrayd J.-C. 2009. Developmental constraints revealed by co-variation within and among molar rows in two murine rodents // Evolution & Development. Vol.11. No.5. P.590–602.
• Rohlf F.J. 1993. Relative warps analysis and example of its application to mosquito wings // Marcus L.F., Bello E. & Garcia-Valdecasas A. (eds.). Contributions to morphometrics. Madrid: C.S.C.I. P.131–160.
• Rohlf F.J. 2017. tpsDig2 ver. 2.31. State University at Stony Brook, New York, NY (program).
• Rohlf F.J. 2019. tpsUtil ver. 1.78. State University at Stony Brook, New York, NY (program).
• Rostova N.S. 2002. [Correlations, their structure and variability] // Trudy Sanct-Petersburg Soc. Naturalists. Vol.94. No.1. 306 p. [in Russian, with English summary]
• Schlosser G. & Wagner G.P. 2004. Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 600 p.
• Seetah K., Cardini A. & Barker G. 2016. A “long-fuse domestication” of the horse? Tooth shape suggests explosive change in modern breeds compared with extinct populations and living Przewalski’s horses // The Holocene. Vol.26. No.8. P.1326–1333.
• Soana S., Gnudi G. & Bertoni G. 1999. The teeth of the horse: Evolution and anatomo-morphological and radiographic study of their development in the foetus // Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. Vol.28. No.5–6. P.273–280.
• Spasskaya N.N. & Pavlinov I.Ya. 2008. [Variation and correlations structure of the cheek toothrow in the Przewalski’s horse (Equus przewalskii; Mammalia: Equidae)] // Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological series. Vol.113. No.2. P.3–13. [in Russian, with English summary]
• StatSoft Inc. 2014. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 12 (program).
• Stock D.W. 2001. The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol.356. No.1414. P.1633–1653.
• Suna B., Deng T. & Liu Y. 2019. Early Pleistocene Equus (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Andersson Loc. 32 in Qixian, Shanxi, China // Historical Biology. Vol.31. No.2. P.211–222.
• Van Valen L. 1965. The study of morphological integration // Evolution. Vol.19. No.3. P.347–349.
• Vasil’ev A.G., Vasil’eva I.A. & Shkurihin A.O. 2018. [Geometric morphometry: from theory to practice]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 471 p. [in Russian]
• Wagner G.P. & Altenberg L. 1996. Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability // Evolution. Vol.50. No.3. P.967–976.
• Young N.M. & Hallgrimsson B. 2005. Serial homology and the evolution of mammalian limb covariation structure // Evolution. Vol.59. No.12. P.2691–2704.
• Zelditch M.L. & Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D. 2012. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 443 p.
• Zelditch M.L., Wood, A.R. & Swiderski D.L. 2009. Building developmental integration into functional systems: Function-induced integration of mandibular shape // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.36. No.1. P.71–87.

Download PDF