Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page
Free access to the published articles
Information about online submission, Articles format, Instructions for authors etc
Instructions for reviewers
Subscription and prices
Contacts

Русскоязычный вариант сайта
Identification of proboscidean tusk from the Plio-Pleistocene transition of the Pekecik Section, Eastern Turkey
Ranjan P.B., Titov V.V., Tesakov A.S., Trikhunkov Y.I., Çelik H.
P. 94-101
A fragment of proboscidean tusk from Pekecik (Plio-Pleistocene transition), Turkey, was studied to ascertain its taxonomic identification and biostratigraphic signal. Characteristic properties of the dentine (Schreger structures) were measured along the transversal and longitudinal sections. Schreger angles showed an increasing range from the tusk axis to the cement-dentine junction (CDJ) with values ranging from 61–109º. The variability of the qualitative Schreger pattern from the “X” type near the tusk axis to the “V” type at the cement-dentine junction (CDJ), were recorded. The wavelength of dentinal tubules showed a decreasing trend from 1.67 mm near the axis to 1.0 mm near the CDJ. Based on these properties, the specimen was compared with already published data and is tentatively assigned to a meridionaloid elephant cf. Archidiskodon sp. In our research, we conclude that the tusk microstructure features are a practical means of taxonomic study.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.21.1.11

References

  • Ábelová M. 2008. Schreger pattern analysis of Mammuthus primigenius tusk: Analytical approach and utility // Bulletin of Geosciences. Vol.83. P.225–232.

  • Agiadi K. & Theodorou G. 2005. Tusk Paleohistology as a tool in the discrimination of fossil tusks from Greece // Alcover J.A. & Bover P. (eds.). Proceedings of the International Symposium “Insular Vertebrate Evolution: The Palaeontological Approach”. Mallorca, Spain: Monografies de la Societat d’História Natural de les Balears. Vol.12. P.1–8.

  • Agostini S., Palombo M.R., Di Canzio E. & Tallini M. 2012. Mammuthus meridionalis (Nesti, 1825) from Campo di Pile (L’Aquila, Abruzzo, Central Italy) // Quaternary International. Vol.276–277. P.42–52.

  • Aguirre E. 1969. Revisión sistemática de los “Elephantidae” por su morfología y morfometría dentaria // Estudios Geológicos, (Madrid). Vol.24. P.1–25.

  • Albayrak E. & Lister A.M. 2012. Dental remains of fossil elephants from Turkey // Quaternary International. Vol.276–277. P.198–211.

  • Baigusheva V.S., Titov V.V. & Foronova I.V. 2016. Teeth of early generations of Early Pleistocene elephants (Mam- malia, Elephantidae) from Sinyaya Balka/Bogatyri site (Sea of Azov Region, Russia) // Quaternary International. Vol.420. P.306–318.

  • Baygusheva V. & Titov V. 2012. The evolution of Eastern European meridionaloid elephants’ dental characteristics // Quaternary International. Vol.255. P.206–216.

  • Bernor R.L. & Lipscomb D. 1991. The systematic position of “Plesiohipparion” aff. huangheense (Equidae, Hipparioni- ni) from Gülyazi, Turkey // Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geol- ogie. Vol.31. P.107–123.

  • Cantalapiedra J.L., Sanisidro Ó., Zhang H., Alberdi M.T., Prado J.L., Blanco F. & Saarinen J. 2021. The rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversity // Nature Ecology & Evolution. Vol.5. P.1266–1272.

  • Dayan E. 1989. Über pleistozäne Elefanten-Funde im Umland von Erzurum in Ostanatolien. Ein Beitrag zur Fundges- chichte des Elephas trogontherii im Becken von Pasinler // Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde, Serie B. Vol.147. P.1–21.

  • Espinoza E.O. & Mann M.J. 1991. Identification Guide for Ivory and Ivory Substitutes. Second edition. Baltimore: World Wildlife Fund and Conservation Foundation. 38 p.

  • Espinoza E.O. & Mann M.J. 1993. The history and significance of the Schreger pattern in proboscidean ivory characterization // Journal of the American Institute for Conservation. Vol.32. P.241–248.

  • Fisher D.C., Trapani J., Shoshani J. & Woodward M. 1998. The Schreger pattern in mastodon and mammoth tusk dentin // Current Research in the Pleistocene. Vol.15. P.105–107.

  • Fox D.L. 2000. Growth increments in Gomphotherium tusk and implications for late Miocene climate change in North America // Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. Vol.156. P.327–348.

  • Garutt V.E. 1986. [Origins of elephants Elephantidae and their phylogeny] // Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Vol.149. P.15–32. [in Russian]

  • Garutt V.E., Alexejeva L.I. & Baigusheva V.S. 1977. On the oldest Archidiskodon elephants from the Anthropogene of the USSR // Journal of the Paleontological Society of India. Vol.20. P.4–9.

  • Garutt W.E. 1998. Is there a genus Archidiskodon Pohlig, 1885, of the family Elephantidae Gray, 1821? // Cranium. Vol.15. No.1. P.15–20.

  • Gheerbrant E. 2009. Paleocene emergence of elephant relatives and the rapid radiation of African ungulates // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Vol.106. No.26. P.10717–10721.

  • Irrlitz W. 1972. Lithostratigraphie und tektonische Entwicklung des Neogens in Nordostanatolien (Kanäozoikum und Braunkohlen der Türkei // Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch. Vol.120. P.3–111.

  • Koenigswald W.v. & Sander P.M. 1997. Glossary of terms used for enamel microstructures // Koenigswald W.v. & Sander P.M. (eds.). Tooth Enamel Microstructure. Rotterdam: Press Balkema. P.267–280.

  • Lambert W.D. 2005. The microstructure of proboscidean ivory and its application to the subordinal identification of isolated ivory specimens // Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History. Vol.45. No.4. P.521–530.

  • Larramendi A., Zhang H., Palombo M.R. & Ferretti M.P. 2020. The evolution of Palaeoloxodon skull structure: disentangling phylogenetic, sexually dimorphic, ontogenetic, and allometric morphological signals // Quaternary Science Reviews. Vol.229. P.e10690.

  • Lister A.M. 1993. “Gradualistic” evolution: its interpretation in Quaternary large mammal species // Quaternary International. Vol.19. P.77–84.

  • Lister A.M. 1996. Evolution and taxonomy of Eurasian mammoths // Shoshani J. & Tassy P. (eds.). The Proboscidea: Evolution and Palaeontology of Elephants and Their Relatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P.204–213.

  • Lynch C.D., McGillycuddy C.T., O’Sullivan V.R. & Sloan A.J. 2010. Gabriel-Philippe de la Hire and the discovery of Hunter-Schreger bands // British Dental Journal. P.461–465.

  • Maglio V.J. 1973. Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae // Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. Vol.63. No.3. P.1–149.

  • Mayda S., Titov V.V., Kaya T., Tesakov A.S., Halaçlar K., Tan A., Alçiçek M.C., Syromyatnikova E.V. & Karakütük S. 2014. Anancus in Turkey // Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Mammoths and their Relatives. Thessaloni- ki, Greece: Scientific Annals, School of Geology, Aristotle University. Special Vol.10. P.127–128.

  • Miles A.E. & White J.W. 1960. Ivory // Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. P.775–780.

  • Osborn H.F. 1936. Proboscidea. Vol.1. New York: American Museum of Natural History. 1675 p.

  • Osborn H.F. 1942. Proboscidea. Vol.2. New York: American Museum of Natural History. 802 p.

  • Palombo M.R. & Villa P. 2001. Schreger lines as support in the Elephantinae identification // Cavarretta G., Giolia F., Mussi M. & Palombo M.R. (eds.). La Terra degli Elefanti/ The World of Elephants. Attidel 1 Congresso Internazionale/Proceedings of the 1st International Congress. Rome: Consiglio Nazionaledelle Ricerche. P.656–660.

  • Palombo M.R. & Ferretti M.P. 2005. Elephant fossil record from Italy: knowledge, problems, and perspectives // Qua- ternary International. Vol.126–128. P.107–136.

  • Palombo M.R., Ferretti M.P., Larramendi A. & Zhang H. 2017. How many Palaeoloxodon species in Eurasia? Disentan- gling phylogenetic, dimorphic, ontogenetic, allometric and environmentally-driven characters // VII International Conference of Mammoths and Their Relatives. Taichung, Taiwan: ICMR. P.2–5.

  • Schreger B. 1800. Beitrag zur Geschichte der Zähne // Beitrage für die Zergliederungskunst. Vol.1. P.1–7.

  • Simakova A.N., Tesakov A., Çelik H., Frolov P.D., Shalae- va E.A., Sokolov S.A., Trikhunkov Y.I., Trifonov V.G., Bachmanov D.M., Latyshev A.V., Ranjan P.B., Gaydale- nok O.V., Syromyatnikova E.V., Kovaleva G.V. & Vasilie- va M.A. 2021. Caspian-type dinocysts in NE Turkey mark deep inland invasion of the Akchagylian brackish-water basin during the terminal Late Pliocene // Quaternary International. Vol.605–606. P.329–348.

  • Tesakov A.S. 2004. [Biostratigraphy of Middle Pliocene — Eo-pleistocene of Eastern Europe (based on small mammals)]. Moskva: Nauka. 247 p. [in Russian]

  • Titov V.V. 2008. [Late Pliocene Large Mammals from North- eastern Sea of Azov Region]. Rostov-on-Don: SSC Russian Academy of Sciences Publishing. 262 p. [in Russian, with English summary]

  • Trapani J. & Fisher D.C. 2003. Discriminating proboscidean taxa using features of the Schreger pattern in tusk dentin // Journal of Archaeological Science. Vol.30. P.429–438.

  • Ünay E. & Bruijn H. 1998. Plio-Pleistocene rodents and lago- morphs from Anatolia // Mededdelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowatenschappen. No.60. P.431–466.

  • Vasilyan D., Schneider S., Bayraktutan M.S. & Şen Ş. 2014. Ear- ly Pleistocene freshwater communities and rodents from the Pasinler Basin (Erzurum province, north-eastern Turkey) // Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. Vol.23. P.293–307.

  • Virág A. 2012. Histogenesis of the unique morphology of proboscidean ivory // Journal of Morphology. P.1406–1423.

  • Wei G., Hu S., Yu K., Hou Y., Li X., Jin C., Wang Y., Zhao J. & Wang W. 2010. New materials of the steppe mammoth, Mammuthus trogontherii, with discussion on the origin and evolutionary patterns of mammoths // Science China: Earth Sciences. Vol.53. P.956–963.

Download PDF