References

• Abramsky Z. & Tracy C.R. 1980. Relation between home range size and regulation of population size in Microtus ochrogaster // Oikos. Vol.34. P.347–355.
• Abramson N.I., Lebedev V.S., Tesakov A.S. & Bannikova A.A. 2009. [Supraspecies relationships in the subfamily Arvicolinae (Rodentia, Cricetidae): an unexpected result of nuclear gene analysis] // Molekulyarnaya Biologiya. Vol.43. P.834–846 [in Russian, with English abstract].
• Agrell J. 1994. A shift in female social organization independent of relatedness: an experimental study on the field vole (Microtus agrestis) // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.6. P.182–191.
• Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods // Behavioral. Vol.49. P.227–267
• Bannikova A.A., Lebedev V.S., Lissovsky A.A., Matrosova V., Abramson N.I., Obolenskaya E.V. & Tesakov A.S. 2010. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Asian lineage of vole genus Microtus (Rodentia: Arvicolinae) inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.99. P.595–613.
• Bazhenov Y.A. 2011. [New data on the ecology of the Mongolian vole (Microtus mongolicus) in Transbaikalia region] // Proceedings of the International Meeting “Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories” (9 Congress of the Theriological Society of RAS), Moscow. P.36 [in Russian].
• Borkowska A. & Ratkiewicz M. 2010. Promiscuity, male reproductive success and mate relatedness in a natural population of the common vole // Journal of Zoology. Vol.280. P.195–201.
• Boyce C.C.K. & Boyce J.L. 1988a. Population biology of Microtus arvalis. II Natal and breeding dispersal of females // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.57. P.723–736.
• Boyce C.C.K. & Boyce J.L. 1988b. Population biology of Microtus arvalis. III. Regulation of numbers and breeding dispersion of females // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.57. P.737–754.
• Buchan J.C., Alberts S.C., Silk J.B. & Altmann J. 2003. True paternal care in a multi-male primate society // Nature. Vol.425. P.179–181.
• Conroy C.J. & Cook J.A. 2000. Molecular systematics of a Holarctic rodent (Microtus: Muridae) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.81. P.344–359.
• Dewsbury. 1985. Paternal behavior in rodents // American Zoologist. Vol.25. P.841–52.
• Elwood R.V. 1985. Inhibition of infanticide and onset of paternal care in male mice (Mus musculus) // Journal of Comparative Psychology. Vol.99. P.457–467.
• Evsikov V.I., Kokenova G.T., Zadubrovskii P.A., Potapova O.F. & Potapov M.A. 2006. Monogamy as one of the ways of realization of the adaptive potential in mammals as exemplified by the steppe lemming Lagurus lagurus Pallas // Doklady Biological Sciences. T.411. P.501–503.
• Fauske J., Andreassen H.P. & Ims R.A. 1997. Spatial organization in a small population of the root vole Microtus oeconomus in a linear habitat // Acta Theriologica. Vol.42. P.79–90.
• Fietz J. & Dausmann K.H. 2003. Cost and potential benefits of parental care in the nocturnal fat-tailed dwarf lemur (Cheirogaleus medius) // Folia Primatologica. Vol.74. No.5–6. P.246–268.
• FitzGerald R.W. & Madison D.M. 1983. Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.13. P.183–187.
• Gaines M.S. & Johnson M.L. 1982. Home range size and population dynamics in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster // Oikos. Vol.39. P.63–70.
• Gajda A.M. & Brooks R.J. 1993. Paternal care in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx richardsoni): artifact or adaptation? // Arctic. Vol.46. P.312–315.
• Galewski T., Tilak M., Sanchez S., Chevret P., Paradis E. & Douzery E. 2006. The evolutionary radiation of Arvicolinae rodents (voles and lemmings): relative contribution of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies // BMC Evolutionary Biology. 6: 80.
• Gaulin S.J.C & FitzGerald R.W. 1988. Home range size as a predictor of mating systems in Microtus // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.69. P.311–319.
• Gliwicz J. 1997. Space use in the root vole: basic patterns and variability // Ecography. Vol.20. P.383–389.
• Gromov V.S. 2009. Parental care in captive red-backed vole (Clethrionomys rutilus) // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. Vol.16. No.3. P.467–473.
• Gromov V.S. 2010. Interactions in family pairs and parental care in captive steppe lemming (Lagurus lagurus) // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. Vol. 3. P.133–139.
• Gromov V.S. 2011. Pair-bonding and parental care in cricetid rodents: a comparative study // Acta Theriologica. Vol.56. P.23–33.
• Gromov V.S. 2013. [Parental care, in rodents: physiological, behavioral and evolutionary aspects]. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 584 p. [in Russian].
• Gromov V.S. & Osadchuk L.V. 2013. Parental care and testosterone in males of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus): sensitization and androgenic stimulation of paternal behavior // Biological Bulletin. T.40. No.1. P.114–118.
• Hartung T.G. & Dewsbury D.A. 1979. Paternal care in six species of muroid rodents // Behavioral and Neural Biology. Vol.26. P.466–478.
• Hasler J.F. 1975. A review of reproduction and sexual maturation in the microtine rodents // The Biologist. Vol.57. P.52–86.
• Heske E.J. 1987. Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole Microtus californicus // Holarctic Ecology. Vol.10. No.2. P.137–148.
• Ims R.A. 1987. Responses in spatial-organization and behavior to manipulations of the food resource in the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.56. P.585–96.
• Jaarola M., Martнnkovб N., Gьndьz I., Brunhoff C., Zima J., Nadachowski A., Amori G., Bulatova N.S., Chondropoulos B., Fraguedakis-Tsolis S., Gonzбlez-Esteban J., Lуpez-Fuster M.J., Kandaurov A.S., Kefelioglu H., Mathias M.D., Villate I. & Searle J.B. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the speciose vole genus Microtus (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Vol.33. P.647–663.
• Jannett F.J., Jr. 1978. The density-dependent formation of extended maternal families of the montane vole, Microtus montanus nanus // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.3. P.245–263.
• de Jong T.R., Chauke M., Harris B.N. & Saltzman W. 2009. From here to paternity: neural correlates of the onset of paternal behavior in California mice (Peromyscus californicus) // Hormones and Behavioral. Vol.56. P.220–231.
• Komers P.E. & Brotherton P.N.M. 1997. Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals // Proceedings: Biological Sciences. Vol.264. P.1261–1270.
• Lambin X., Krebs C. & Scott B. 1992. Spacing system of tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) during the breeding season in Canada’s western Arctic // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.70. P.2068–2072.
• Libhaber N. & Eilam D. 2004. Parental investment in social voles varies and is relatively independent of litter size // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.85. P.748–755.
• Lonstein J.S. & De Vries G.J. 1999. Sex differences in the parental behaviour of adult virgin prairie voles: Independence from gonadal hormones and vasopressin // Journal of Neuroendocrinology. Vol.11. P.441–449.
• Madison D.M. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.7. P.65–71.
• Malkova M.G., Palchekh N.A., Yakimenko V.V. & Kuzmin I.V. 2004. [The spatiotemporal structure of rodent populations in the steppe zone of Western Siberia] // Ekologiya. Vol.1. P.34–42 [in Russian, with English abstract].
• McGuire B. 1997. Influence of father and pregnancy on maternal care in red-backed voles // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.78. No.3. P.839–849.
• McGuire B. & Bemis W. 2007. Litter size influences maternal but not paternal care in three species of voles, as measured by nest attendance // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.88. No.6. P.1420–1426.
• McGuire B. & Getz L.L. 1998. The nature and frequency of social interactions among free-living prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Vol.43. P.271-279.
• McGuire B. & Novak M. 1984. A comparison of maternal behaviour in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), prairie vole (M. ochrogaster) and pine vole (M. pinetorum) // Animal Behaviour. Vol.32. P.1132–1141.
• McGuire B. & Novak M. 1986. Parental care and its relationship to social organization in the montane vole (Microtus montanus) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.67. P.305–11.
• Meyer M.N., Golenishchev F.N., Radjabli S.I. & Sablina O. V. 1996. [Voles (subgenus Microtus Schrank) of Russia and adjacent territories] // Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS. Vol.232. P.1–320 [in Russian].
• Miller D.H. & Getz L.L. 1969. Life-history notes on Microtus pinetorum in Central Connecticut // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.50. P.777–784.
• Myllymaki A. 1977. Intraspecific competition and home range dynamics in the field vole Microtus agrestis // Oikos. Vol.29. P.553–569.
• Nekipelov N.V. 1935. [Data on the ecology of the rodents from vicinity of Barun-Torey Lake] // Izvestiya Irkutskogo Nauchnogo Issledovatel’skogo Protivochumnogo Instituta Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. T.2. P.64–103 [in Russian].
• Oliveras D. & Novak M. 1986. A comparison of paternal behaviour in the meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus, the pine vole M. pinetorum and the prairie vole M. ochrogaster // Animal Behavior. Vol.34. P.519–526.
• Ostfeld R.S. 1985. Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents // The American Naturalist. Vol. 126. P.1–15.
• Ostfeld R.S. 1986. Territoriality and mating system of California voles // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.55. P.691–706.
• Ostfeld R.S. 1990. The ecology of territoriality in small mammals // Trends in Ecology and Evolution Vol.5. P.411–415.
• Ostfeld R.S., Pugh S.R., Seamon J.O. & Tamarin R.H. 1988. Space use and reproductive success in a population of meadow voles // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.57. P.385–394.
• Parker K.J. & Lee T.M. 2001. Social and environmental factors influence the suppression of pub-directed aggression and development of paternal behavior in captive meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) // Journal of Comparative Psychology. Vol.115. P.331–336.
• Pusenius J. & Viitala J. 1995. Familiarity of breeding field vole (Microtus agrestis) females does not affect their space use and demography of the population // Annales Zoologici Fennici. Vol.32. P.217–223.
• Schradin C. & Pillay N. 2003. Paternal care in the social and diurnal striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio): laboratory and field evidence // Journal of Comparative Psychology. Vol.117. P.317–324.
• Schradin C. & Pillay N. 2005. Intraspecific variation in the spatial and social organization of the African striped mouse // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.86. P.99107.
• Shilton C.M. & Brooks R.J. 1989. Paternal care in captive collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx richardsoni) and its effect on development of the offspring // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.67. P.2740–2745.
• Smorkatcheva A.V. 2003. Parental care in the captive mandarin vole, Lasiopodomys mandarinus // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.81. P.1339–1345.
• Smorkatcheva A.V. & Bulatova E.V. 2009. [Social structure and spacing in the yellow steppe lemming, Eolagurus luteus, under semi-natural conditions] // Proceedings of the Scientific Conference on Mammalian Behavior and Behavioral Ecology, Moscow. P.42 [in Russian].
• Smorkatcheva A.V., Bychenkova T.N. & Zavjalov E.L. 2010. Parental responsiveness negatively correlates with fecal testosterone concentration in male mandarin voles (Microtus mandarinus) // Journal of Ethology. Vol.28. P.53–60.
• Smorkatcheva A.V., Bychenkova T.N. & Kowalskaya Y.M. 2011. [Parental responsiveness in voles: the effect of mating system and phylogeny] // Proceedings of the International Meeting “Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories” (9 Congress of the Theriological Society of RAS), Moscow. P.449 [in Russian].
• Solomon N.G. 1993. Comparison of parental behaviour in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.71. P.434–37.
• Storey A.E. & Joyce T.L. 1995. Pup contact promotes paternal responsiveness in male meadow voles // Animal Behavior. Vol.49. P.1–10.
• Storey A.E. & Snow D.T. 1987. Male identity and enclosure size affect paternal attendance of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus // Animal Behavior. Vol.35. P.411–419.
• Tast J. 1966. The root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), as an inhabitant of seasonally flooded land // Annales Zoologici Fennici. Vol.3. P.127–171.
• Terleph T.A., Jean-Baptiste N. & Bamshad M. 2004. Mechanisms and time course for induction of paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.85. P.1124–1129.
• Topping M.G. & Millar J.S. 1996. Spatial distribution in the bushy-tailed woodrat (Neotoma cinerea) and its implications for the mating system // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.74. P.565–569.
• Wolff J.O., Edge W.D. & Bentley R. 1994. Reproductive and behavioral biology of the gray-tailed vole // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.75. P.873–879.
• Xia X. & Millar J.S. 1988. Paternal behavior by Peromyscus leucopus in enclosures // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.66. P.1184–87.

Download PDF