References

• Albrechtová J., Albrecht T., Baird S.J.E., Macholán M., Rudolfsen G., Munclinger P., Tucker P.K. & Piálek J. 2012. Sperm-related phenotypes implicated in both maintenance and breakdown of a natural species barrier in the house mouse // Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences. Vol.279. No.1748. P.4803–4810.
• Alekperov Kh.M. 1966. [Mammals of Southwestern Azerbaijan]. Baku: Akademiya Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR. 147 p. [in Russian].
• Alieva Sh.B. 1965. [Materials on the fauna and ecology of rodents of Nakhichevan ASSR] // Turaev D.G. (ed.). [Fauna and Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates of Azerbaijan]. Baku: Akademiya Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR. P.133–164 [in Russian].
• Ambaryan A.V. & Kotenkova E.V. 2008. [A comparative analysis of sexual behavior of Mus musculus and Mus spicilegus] // Uspechi Sovremennoi Biologii. Vol.128. No.2. P.199–214 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Ambaryan A.V., Maltzev A.N. & Kotenkova E.V. 2015. [Relationship between characteristics of sexual behavior and male sperm competitive ability in taxa of superspecies complex Mus musculus sensu lato] // Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii. Vol.76. No.3. P.212–224 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Ambaryan A.V., Voznessenskaya V.V. & Kotenkova E.V. 2019. Mating behavior differences in monogamous and polygamous sympatric closely related species Mus musculus and Mus spicilegus and their role in behavioral precopulatory isolation // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.18. No.2. P.67–79.
• Arnold M.L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. 228 p.
• Arnold M.L. & Martin N.H. 2010. Hybrid fitness across time and habitats // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol.25. No.9. P.530–536.
• Baack E.J. & Rieseberg L.H. 2007. A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation // Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Vol.17. No.6. P.513–518.
• Bank C., Hermisson J. & Kirkpatrick M. 2011. Can reinforcement complete speciation? // Evolution. Vol.66. No.1. P.229–239.
• Barton N.Y. 2001. The role of hybridization in evolution // Molecular Ecology. Vol.10. No.3. P.551–568.
• Batty J. 1978a. Acute changes in plasma testosterone levels and their relation to measures of sexual behaviour in the male house mouse (Mus musculus) // Animal Behaviour. Vol.26. No.2. P.349–357.
• Batty J. 1978b. Plasma levels of testosterone and male sexual behaviour in strains of the house mouse (Mus musculus) // Animal Behaviour. Vol.26. No.2. P.339–348.
• Beach F.A. 1976. Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals // Hormones and Behavior. Vol.7. No.7. P.105–138.
• Bímová B., Macholán M., Baird S.J.E., Munclinger P., Dufková P., Laukaitis C.M., Karn R.C., Luzynski K., Tucker P.K. & Piálek J. 2011. Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone // Molecular Ecology. Vol.20. No.11. P.2403–2424.
• Bonhomme F., Anand R., Darviche D., Din W. & Boursot P. 1994. The mouse as a ring species? // Moriwaki K., Shiroishi T. & Yonekawa H. (eds.). Genetics in Wild Mice. Its application to Biomedical Research. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press. P.13–23.
• Borkin L.Ya. & Litvinchuk S.N. 2013. [Hybridization, Speciation, and Systematics of Animals]. Alimov A.F. & Stepan’yants S.D. (eds.). [Current Problems of Biological Taxonomy]. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR. Suppl. No.2. Saint Petersburg: KMK Sci Press. P.83–139 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Boursot P., Auffray J-C., Britton-Davidian J. & Bonhomme F. 1993. The evolution of house mice // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Vol.24. P.119–152.
• Britton-Davidian J., Fel-Clair F., Lopez J., Alibert P. & Boursot P. 2005. Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.84. No.3. P.379–393.
• Canastar A. & Maxson S.C. 2003. Sexual aggression in mice: effects of male strain and of female estrous state // Behavior Genetics. Vol.33. No.5. P.521–528.
• Comeault A.A. & Matute D.R. 2018. Genetic divergence and the number of hybridizing species affect the path to homoploid hybrid speciation // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. Vol.115. No.39. P.9761–9766.
• Crowcroft P. 1955. Social organization in wild mouse colonies // British Journal of Animal Behaviour. Vol.3. No.1. P.1–36.
• Cucchi T., Kovács Z., Berthon R., Orth A., Bonhomme F., Evin A., Siahsarvie R., Darvish J., Bakhshaliyev V. & Marro C. 2013. On the trail of Neolithic mice and men towards Transcaucasia: zooarchaeological clues from Nakhchivan (Azerbaijan) // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.108. No.4. P.917–928.
• Dewsbury D.A., Oglesby J.M., Sandra L., Shea S.L., James L. & Connor J.L. 1979. Inbreeding and copulatory behavior in house mice: a further consideration // Behavior Genetics. Vol.9. No.3. P.151–163.
• Dobson F.S. & Baudoin C. 2002. Experimental tests of spatial association and kinship in monogamous mice (Mus spicilegus) and polygamous mice (Mus musculus domesticus) // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.80. No.6. P.980–986.
• Eigelis Yu.K. 1980. [Rodents of Eastern Trans-Caucasia and the Problem of Rehabilitation of Local Foci of Plague]. Saratov: Saratov University Press. 262 p. [in Russian].
• Estep D.Q., Lanier D.L. & Dewsbury D.A. 1975. Copulatory behavior and nest building behavior of wild house mice (Mus musculus) // Animal Learning & Behavior. Vol.3. No.4. P.329−336.
• Feliner G.N., Alvarez I., Fuertes-Aguilar J., Heuertz M., Marques I., Moharrek F., Pineiro R., Riina R., Rossello J.A., Soltis P.S. & Villa-Machío I. 2017. Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist’s view // Heredity. Vol.118. No.6. P.513–516.
• Firman R.C. & Simmons L.W. 2009. Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice // Evolution. Vol.64. No.5. P.1245–1256.
• Firman R.C., Garcia-Gonzalez F., Thyer E., Wheeler S., Yamin Z., Yuan M. & Simmons L.W. 2015. Evolutionary changes in testes tissue composition among experimental populations of house mice // Evolution. Vol.69. No.3. P.848–855.
• Forejt J. & Ivanyi P. 1974. Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice (Mus musculus L.) // Genetics Research. Vol.24. No.2. P.189–206.
• Frisman L.V., Korobitsina K.V., Yakimenko L.V., Bokshtein F.M. & Muntyanu A.I. 1990. Genetic differentiation of the U.S.S.R. house mice: electrophoretic study of proteins // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.41. No.1–3. P.65–72.
• Good J.M., Handel M.A. & Nachman M.W. 2008. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice // Evolution. Vol.62. No.1. P.50–65.
• Hewitt G.M. 2001. Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography — or seeing genes in space and time // Molecular Ecology. Vol.10. No.3. P.537–549.
• Jaenike J., Dyer K.A., Cornish C. & Minhas M.S. 2006. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila // PLoS Biology. Vol.4. No.10. P.1852–1862.
• Kotenkova E.V. & Munteanu A.I. 2006. [A comparative analysis of the spatial-ethological population structure of different species of house mice related to their mode of life] // Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii. Vol.126. No.5. P.513–528 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Kotenkova E.V. & Naidenko S.V. 1999. Discrimination of conand heterospecific odors in different taxa of the Mus musculus species group: olfactory cues as precopulatory isolating mechanism // Johnston R.E., Muller-Schwarze D. & Sorensen P. (eds.). Advances in Chemical Communication in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press. P.299–308.
• Kotenkova E.V., Mal’tsev A.N. & Ambaryan A.V. 2018. Experimental analysis of the reproductive potential of house mice (Mus musculus sensu lato, Rodentia, Muridae) in Transcaucasia and other regions // Biology Bulletin. Vol.45. No.8. P.884–897.
• Kotenkova E.V., Osadchuck A.V. & Lyalyukhina S.I. 1989b. Precopulatory isolating mechanisms between the house and mound-building mouse // Acta Theriologica. Vol.34. No.22. P.315–324.
• Kotenkova E.V., Osipova O.V. & Lyalyukhina S.I. 1989a. [Behavioral elements and seasonal changes of behavior in mound-building mice (Mus hortulanus Nordm.)] // Sokolov V.E., Kotenkova E.V., Krasnov B.R. & Meshkova N.N. (eds.). The House Mouse. Moscow: Institute of Evolutionary Animal Morphology and Ecology Press. P.256–272 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Kotenkova E., Romachenko A., Ambaryan A. & Maltsev A. 2019. Effect of early experience on neuronal and behavioral responses to conand heterospecific odors in closely related Mus taxa: epigenetic contribution in formation of precopulatory isolation // BMC Evolutionary Biology. Vol.19. P.51.
• Latour Y. & Ganem G. 2017. Does competitive interaction drive species recognition in a house mouse secondary contact zone? // Behavioral Ecology. Vol.28. No.1. P.212–221.
• Latour Y., Perriat-Sanguinet M., Caminade P., Boursot P., Smadja C.M. & Ganem G. 2013. Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone // Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences. Vol.281. No.1776. e.20132733.
• Levenets J.V., Panteleeva S.N., Reznikova Zh.I., Gureeva A.V., Feoktistova N.Y. & Surov A.V. 2019. Experimental comparative analysis of hunting behavior of four species of Cricetinae hamsters // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.98. No.6. P.673–683 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Mackintosh J.H. 1981. Behaviour of house mouse // Symposia of the Zoological Society of London. Vol.47. P.337–365. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation // Nature. Vol.446. No.7133. P.279–283.
• Maltsev A.N., Ambaryan A.V., Bazhenov U.A. & Kotenkova E.V. 2016. Experimental hybridization and an evaluation of the fertility of some forms of the house mouse supraspecies complex Mus musculus (Rodentia, Muridae) // Biology Bulletin. Vol.43. No.7. P.747–757.
• Maltsev A.N., Stakheev V.V., Bogdanov A.S., Fomina E.S. & Kotenkova E.V. 2015. Phylogenetic relationships of intraspecific forms of the house mouse Mus musculus: Analysis of variability of the control region (D-loop) of mitochondrial DNA// Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.465. No.3. P.285–288.
• Mavárez J. & Linares M. 2008. Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals // Molecular Ecology. Vol.17. No.19. P.4181–4185. McGill T.E. 1962. Sexual behavior in three inbred strains of mice // Behaviour. Vol.19. No.4. P.341–350.
• Mezhzherin S.V. & Kotenkova E.V. 1989. [Genetic marking of the house mouse subspecies of the USSR fauna] // Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. Vol.304. No.5. P.1271–1275 [in Russian].
• Mezhzherin S.V., Kotenkova E.V. & Mikhailenko A.G. 1998. The house mice, Mus musculus s. l., hybrid zone of Trans-Caucasus // Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde. Bd.63. Hf.2. S.154–168.
• Mihola O., Trachtulec Z., Vlcek C., Schimenti J.C. & Forejt J. 2009. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone h3 methyltransferase // Science. Vol.323. No.5912. P.373–375.
• Milishnikov A.N. 2004. Differentiation between the ancestral and evolutionarily new polymorphism in populations of the superspecies complex of house mice Mus musculus sensu lato // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.397. No.2. P.317–320.
• Milishnikov A.N., Lavrenchenko L.A. & Lebedev V.S. 2004. Origin of the house mice (superspecies complex Mus musculus sensu lato) from the Transcaucasia region: a new look at dispersal routes and evolution // Russian Journal of Genetics. Vol.40. No.9. P.1011–1026.
• Milishnikov A.N., Rafiev A.N., Lavrenchenko L.A. & Orlov V.N. 1990. High level of introgression of Mus domesticus genes in a Transcaucasian population of Mus musculus s. str. // Doklady Biological Sciences. Vol.311. No.3. P.279–282.
• Mosig D.W. & Dewsbury D.A. 1976. Studies of the copulatory behavior of house mice (Mus musculus) // Behavioral Biology. Vol.16. No.4. P.463–473.
• Nelson J.F., Felicio L.S., Randall P.K., Sims C. & Finch C.E. 1982. A longitudinal study of estrous cyclicity in aging C57BL/6J mice: I. Cycle frequency, length and vaginal cytology // Biology of Reproduction. Vol.27. No.2. P.327–339.
• Niel L. & Monks D.A. 2013. Mouse sex: sexual differentiation and sexual behavior in Mus musculus // Crusio W.E., Sluyter F., Gerlai R.T. & Pietropaolo S. (eds.). Behavioral Genetics of the Mouse. Vol.1. Genetics of Behavioral Phenotypes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P.218–229.
• Nosil P., Crespi B.J., Gries R. & Gries G. 2007. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation // Genetica. Vol.128. No.3. P.309–327.
• Orth A., Lyapunova E., Kandaurov A., Boissinot S., Boursot P., Vorontsov N. & Bonhomme F. 1996. L’espèce polytypique Mus musculus en Transcaucasie // Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences. Series III. Sciences de la Vie. Vol.319. No.5. P.435–441.
• Panteleeva S.N., Levenets J.V., Novikovskaya A.A., Reznikova Zh.I., Lopatina N.V. & Litvinov Yu.N. 2020. Experimental investigation of the hunting behavior in mountain voles Alticola strelzowi and Alticola tuvinicus (Rodentia, Cricetidae) // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.99. No.1. P.113–120 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Park J.H. 2011. Assessment of male sexual behavior in mice // Todd D.G. (ed.). Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice: Characterization Using Behavioral Tests. Vol.2. New York: Humana Press. P.357–373.
• Patris B., Gouat P., Jacquot C., Christophe N. & Baudoin C. 2002. Agonistic and sociable behaviors in the mound-building mouse, Mus spicilegus, a comparative study with Mus musculus domesticus // Aggressive Behavior. Vol.28. No.1. P.75–84.
• Poteaux C., Busquet N., Gouat P., Katona K. & Baudoin C. 2008. Socio-genetic structure of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, in autumn and early spring // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol.93. No.4. P.689–699.
• Rieseberg L.H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Vol.28. P.359–389.
• Sage R.D., Atchley W.R. & Capanna E. 1993. House mice as models in systematic biology // Systematic Biology. Vol.42. No.4. P.523–561.
• Schulte U., Veith M. & Hochkirch A. 2012. Rapid genetic assimilation of native wall lizard populations (Podarcis muralis) through extensive hybridization with introduced lineages // Molecular Ecology. Vol.21. No.17. P.4313–4326.
• Schumer M., Rosenthal G.G. & Andolfatto P. 2014. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation? // Evolution. Vol.68. No.6. P.1553–1560.
• Schumer M., Rosenthal G.G. & Andolfatto P. 2018. What do we mean when we talk about hybrid speciation? // Heredity. Vol.120. No.4. P.379–382.
• Smadja C. & Ganem G. 2005. Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Vol.18. No.6. P.1485–1493.
• Stopka P. & Macdonald D.W. 1998. Signal interchange during mating in the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus: The concept of active and passive signaling // Behaviour. Vol.135. No.2. P.231–249.
• Stopka P. & Macdonald D.W. 1999. The market effect in the wood mouse Apodemus slvaticus: Selling information on reproductive status // Ethology. Vol.105. No.11. P.969–982.
• Suzuki T.A. & Nachman M.W. 2015. Speciation and reduced hybrid female fertility in house mice // Evolution. Vol.69. No.9. 2468–2481.
• Tembotov A.K. & Shkhashamiev Kh.K. 1984. [The Fauna of Kabardino-Balkaria]. Nalchik: Elbrus. 192 p. [in Russian]. Turner L.M., Schwahn D.J. & Harr B. 2012. Reduced male fertility is common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone // Evolution. Vol.66. No.2. P.443–458.
• Uy J.A.C., Irwin D.E. & Webster M.S. 2018. Behavioral isolation and incipient speciation in birds // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Vol.49. P.1–24.
• Walkowa W., Kotenkova E., Adamczyk K. & Barkowska M. 1998. Behavior of house mice in semi-natural conditions: influence of spatial separation and population size // Acta Theriologica. Vol.43. No.3. P.241–254.
• White M.A., Steffy B., Wiltshire T. & Payseur B.A. 2011. Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice, Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus // Genetics. Vol.189. No.1. P.289–304.
• Wolf R.J. 1985. Mating behaviour and female choice: their relation to social structure in wild caught house mice (Mus musculus) housed in semi-natural environment // Journal of Zoology. Vol.207. No.1. P.43–51.
• Zorenko T. 2013. [Social Voles of the Subgenus Sumeriomys: Systematics, Biology and Behaviour] Saarbrücken: Palmariun Academic Publishing. 548 p. [in Russian].

Download PDF