Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page    

Russian Journal of Theriology. Main page
Free access to the published articles
Information about online submission, Articles format, Instructions for authors etc
Instructions for reviewers
Subscription and prices
Contacts

Русскоязычный вариант сайта
Consumption of anthelmintic fox baits by target and non-target mammals in Japan
Sakurai Y., Uraguchi K., Kouguchi H., Oshida T.
P. 183–187
Echinococcosis is a zoonosis caused by the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis, which uses red fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a principle definitive host. To decrease E. multilocularis prevalence in red foxes, feeding the “fox bait” containing anthelmintic praziquantel to red foxes is effective. However, a previous investigation conducted in Hokkaido, Japan showed that raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes viverrinus albus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), domestic cats (Felis catus), and murids frequently consumed fox baits without the anthelmintic praziquantel, suggesting they compete with red foxes for the bait. On the other hand, anthelmintic praziquantel has a bitter taste and unpleasant odor to dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and cats. The inclusion of anthelmintic praziquantel in the bait may deter the consumption of fox baits by non- target mammals. Therefore, by using camera traps, we examined the seasonal consumption of fox baits with the anthelmintic praziquantel by mammals in Memuro, Tokachi District, Hokkaido, Japan, from May to October, 2019. We found that red foxes, raccoons, raccoon dogs, murids, and Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) frequently consumed fox baits. Therefore, the bitterness and smell of the bait do not efficiently work to prevent consumption by non-target mammals. Of those, raccoon dogs were most frequent consumers of the fox bait. Raccoons and Eurasian red squirrels also frequently consumed the fox bait, especially in spring and in autumn, respectively. These results show competition for fox baits by non-target mammals. This should be considered for planning of the baiting campaign.

DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.20.2.07

References

  • Arisawa H., Uraguchi K., Kouguchi H. & Oshida T. 2020. Note on consumption of fox bait by alien raccoons in eastern Hokkaido, Japan // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.19. P.178–182.
  • Asakawa M., Matoba Y., Yamada D. & Kamiyama T. 2000. Review of the parasitological state of feral raccoons captured in Nopporo National Park and its proximity, Hokkaido // Journal of Rakuno Gakuen University. Vol.25. P.1–8 [in Japanese with English summary].
  • Bernachon N., McGahie D., Corvaisier D., Benizeau E., Crastes N. & Chaix G. 2014. Comparative palatability of two veterinary dewormers (Milpro® and Milbemax®): A blinded randomised crossover cat study // Veterinary Record Open. Vol.1. P.e000080.
  • Gurnell J. 1987. The Natural History of Squirrels. London: Christopher Helm. 201 p.
  • Hegglin D., Ward P.I. & Deplazes P. 2003. Anthelmintic baiting of foxes against urban contamination with Echinococcus multilocularis // Emerging Infection Diseases. Vol.9. P.1266–1272.
  • Hokkaido Government. 2007. [A Guideline Using Anthelmintics on Red Foxes: Measures against Echinococcosis]. Sapporo: Hokkaido Government. 15 p. [in Japanese].
  • Ikeda T. 2015. Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758) // Ohdachi S.D., Iwasa M.A., Ishibashi Y., Fukui D. & Saitoh T. (eds.). The Wild Mammals of Japan. 2nd ed. Kyoto: Shoukadoh Book Seller. P.232–233.
  • Ishida A., Takahashi K., Uraguchi K. & Oshida T. 2014. Environmental factors for efficiently baiting red foxes in agricultural areas in eastern Hokkaido, Japan // Mammal Study. Vol.39. P.167–172.
  • Iwashita A., Ogawa H. & Ando M. 2015. Effectiveness of camera trap data as relative abundance index of the raccoon (Procyon lotor) // Journal of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture. Vol.60. P.69–76 [in Japanese with English summary].
  • König A., Romig T. & Holzhofer E. 2019. Effective long-term control of Echinococcus multilocularis in a mixed rural-urban area in southern Germany // PLOS ONE. Vol.14. No.4. P.e0214993.
  • Nonaka N. 2014. [Echinococcosis and countermeasure for its infectious source] // Journal of Veterinary Epidemiology. Vol.18. P.150–152 [in Japanese].
  • Oku Y. 2010. [Echinococcosis]. Tokyo: Japan Livestock Industry Association. 19 p. [in Japanese].
  • Romig T., Bilger B., Dinkel A., Merli M., Thoma D., Will R., Mackenstedt U. & Lucius R. 2007. Impact of praziquantel baiting on intestinal helminths of foxes in southwestern Germany // Helminthologia. Vol.44. P.137–144.
  • Schwarz S., Sutor A., Staubach C., Mattis R., Tackmann K. & Conraths F.J. 2011. Estimated prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis in raccoon dogs Nyctereutes procyonoides in northern Brandenburg, Germany // Current Zoology. Vol.57. P.655–661.
  • Soulsbury C.D., Baker P.J., Iossa G. & Harris S. 2010. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) // Gehrt S.D., Riley S.P.D. & Cypher B.L. (eds.). Urban Carnivores: Ecology, Conflict, and Conservation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. P.62–75.
  • Takahashi K., Uraguchi K., Romig T., Hatakeyama H. & Tamura M. 2002. [Preliminary report on Echinococcus multilocularis control by fox bating with paraziquantel] // Report of the Hokkaido Institute of Public Health. Vol.52. P.61–63 [in Japanese].
  • Takahashi K., Uraguchi K., Abe S. & Hirakawa, H. 2010. [Making acceptable bait by red foxes] // Report of the Hokkaido Institute of Public Health. Vol.60. P.81–82 [in Japanese].
  • Takyu M., Takahashi K., Uraguchi K. & Oshida T. 2013. Fox bait consumption and camera trapping in agricultural areas in eastern Hokkaido, Japan // Mammal Study. Vol.38. P.57–60.
  • Tsukada H., Hamazaki K., Ganzorig S., Iwaki T., Konno K., Lagapa J.T., Matsuo K., Ono A., Shimizu M., Sakai H., Morishima Y., Nonaka N., Oku Y. & Kamiya M. 2002. Potential remedy against Echinococcus multilocularis in wild red foxes using baits with anthelmintic distributed around fox breeding dens in Hokkaido, Japan // Parasitology. Vol.125. P.119–129.
  • Tsukada H. 2005. [Foraging behavior of red foxes and echinococcosis] // Honyurui Kagaku [Mammalian Science]. Vol.45. P.91–98 [in Japanese].
  • Yamaguchi E. 2015. [Environmental Risk Factors Associated with Infection in Raccoons]. PhD Thesis. Morioka: The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University. 105 p. [in Japanese with English summary].
  • Yamashita J. & Kamiya M. 1997. [Echinococcus: Its Characters and Preventives]. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press. 274 p. [in Japanese].
  • Yokohata Y. 2015. Wild mammal-borne zoonoses and mammalogists in Japan // Ohdachi S.D., Iwasa M.A., Ishibashi Y., Fukui D. & Saitoh T. (eds.). The Wild Mammals of Japan. 2nd ed. Kyoto: Shoukadoh Book Seller. P.228–231.
  • Zlatanova D.P. & Popova E.D. 2018. Biodiversity estimates from different camera trap surveys: a case study from Osogovo MT., Bulgaria // Nature Conservation Research. Vol.3. P.13–25.

Download PDF